Rapid perceptual integration of facial expression and emotional body language.

By H. Meeren, Corné C R J van Heijnsbergen, B. de Gelder. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005

703 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c328d6681aa7b44fe0f3a7a2f40e591e347b68c5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The development and neural basis of referential gaze perception (2006, result): “In addition, Meeren, van Heijnsbergen, and de Gelder ( 2005 ) found that incongruence between facial and bodily expressions elicits larger P1 amplitudes, which may corroborate the present study and suggests that the P120 can reflect an early contextual modulation of social information processing.”
Affective Body Expression Perception and Recognition: A Survey (2013, background): “According to studies by de Gelder et al. body expressions may provide more information than the face when discriminating between fear and anger [11] or fear and happiness [12].”
Panoptic Studio: A Massively Multiview System for Social Motion Capture (2015, background): “However, systematic studies of such phenomena have remained almost entirely focused on the analysis of facial expressions, despite emerging evidence [28, 3] that facial expressions provide a fundamentally incomplete characterization of nonverbal communication.”
Towards the neurobiology of emotional body language (2006, neutral): “Amygdala processing stages are probably similar 37,39,40 , as these stimuli elicit comparable amplitude, latency and scalp distribution of the N170.”
Panoptic Studio: A Massively Multiview System for Social Interaction Capture (2016, background): “such phenomena have remained almost entirely focused on the analysis of facial expressions, despite emerging evidence [6], [7] that facial expressions provide a fundamentally incomplete characterization of nonverbal communication.”
The Direct-Perception Model of Empathy: a Critique (2011, background): “Furthermore, Meeren et al. (2005) and Aviezer et al. (2008) have provided evidence that in case of incongruent bodily and facial expressions (e.g. a facial expression of disgust and a bodily expression of anger), the former may win over the latter (e.g. participants judge that the face expresses…”
Categorical and dimensional affect analysis in continuous input: Current trends and future directions (2013, background): “Congruency has been investigated to some extent in multimodal expression and perception of categorical emotions [87,88].”
The neural basis of visual body perception (2007, background): “An ERP study on emotion recognition found behavioural and neural evidence that facial and bodily emotions have congruent effects: subjects recognized emotions from the face more quickly and accurately when the emotion displayed by the body was congruen”
Emotion representation, analysis and synthesis in continuous space: A survey (2011, background): “combined perception of human facial and bodily expressions [39], as well as human detection of emotion signs in different modalities (speech, facial expressions, gestures) when they appear to be blended or masked [40].”
Three Stages of Facial Expression Processing: ERP Study with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (2009, result): “Meeren et al. (2005) reported that the P1 component was not affected by emotion expressed in isolated faces and bodies; however, the study compared only two negative emotional expressions, namely, fear and anger.”