Adoption of Agricultural Production Practices: Lessons Learned from the U.S. Department of Agriculture Area Studies Project
By M. Caswell, K. Fuglie, C. Ingram, S. Jans, Catherine Kascak. 2001
224 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c30f7f89d7445a427400e3ba887d24af15c57545
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
- R. Llewellyn
- L. Prokopy
- Kristin M. Floress
- F. D'Emden
- M. Burton
- Baqir Lalani
- G. Holloway
- Adam Baumgart-Getz
Citations in the corpus
- Analysis of farm performance in Europe under different climatic and management conditions to improve understanding of adaptive capacity (2007, background): “Characteristics like farm size, area sown with a specific crop, access to technology, education, tenancy status, attitude towards risk and contact with extension agents are the main factors that affect technology adoption (Caswell et al. 2001; Sheikh et al. 2003).”
- Adoption of agricultural conservation practices in the United States: Evidence from 35 years of quantitative literature (2019, background): “…et al. 2000); when farm operators own the land they manage, studies have observed an increase in the level of adoption of a number of practices including nutrient management (Bosch et al. 1995; Khanna 2001), pest management (Caswell et al. 2001), and soil management practices (Lichtenberg 2004).”
- Cost-effective design of agri-environmental payment programs: U.S. experience in theory and practice (2008, background): “…experience, primary occupation (farm or non-farm), and other socioeconomic characteristics – as well as land characteristics – can be important in the adoption of various conservation practices (e.g., Caswell et al., 2001; Cooper and Keim, 1996; Soule et al., 2000; Khanna, 2001; Lichtenberg, 2004).”
- Profiles of US farm households adopting conservation-compatible practices (2007, background): “As a result, farming remains a major source of some pollutants (Ribaudo, 2000; Claassen et al., 2001).”
- Smallholder farmers' motivations for using Conservation Agriculture and the roles of yield, labour and soil fertility in decision making (2016, background): “Recent economic theory contends that the adopter makes a choice based on maximization of expected utility subject to prices, policies, personal characteristics and natural resource assets (Caswell et al., 2001).”
- Determinants of agricultural best management practice adoption: Evidence from the literature (2008, background): “The impacts of farming experience, however, may be mediated somewhat as farmers grow older (see, e.g., Belknap and Saupe 1988; Caswell et al. 2001).”
- Factors influencing adoption of conservation tillage in Australian cropping regions (2008, background): “This finding is reinforced by the work of Caswell et al. (2001) who observed that high average monthly rainfall significantly †The Odds ratio effects show the proportional effect of a one unit change in the level of a variable (or the presence/absence of dummy variables) on the adoption odds ratio.”
- Factors influencing the conversion to organic farming in Norway (2008, background): “A discrete choice of technology is made that leads to an altered level of inputs and profit (Caswell et al., 2001).”