The Network Society: Social Aspects of New Media

By J. V. van Dijk. 2005

753 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c2dd67b1389ee60e0d9cd1a42aed2184b6937d07

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Digital Inequality (2008, background): “…(Fallows, 2004; National Telecommunications and Information Administration [NTIA], 2002), scholars have started calling for refined approaches to the study of the so-called digital divide (Barzilai-Nahon, 2006; Hargittai, 2002, 2003a; Mossberger, Tolbert, & Stansbury, 2003; van Dijk, 1999, 2005).”
Africa and the digital divide (2008, background): “Keywords: Information society; Digital divide; Africa; Developing countries; Globalization; Capitalist development”
The Evolution of the Digital Divide - The Digital Divide Turns to Inequality of Skills and Usage (2012, background): “A network society can be defined as a society that is increasingly based upon a combined infrastructure of social and media networks [34].”
Second Thoughts: Toward a Critique of the Digital Divide (2003, unknown): “There are also information want-nots (Brady, 2000; NTIA, 2000; Van Dijk, 2000) and even internet drop-outs (Katz and Aspden, 1998) – those who had access at one time and decide, for various reasons, against continued use.”
Cognitive ability and Internet use among older adults (2006, background): “Four measures of use are considered: having high-speed access, length of time since initial household adoption, self-reported time using the Internet, and whether any of the respondent’s Internet use involves the Web in addition to email.”
Comparing internet and mobile phone usage: digital divides of usage, adoption, and dropouts (2003, background): “Based on this brief review, the conclusion is drawn here that there is no simple or singular digital divide (Van Dijk, 1999, p. 155).”
Apart from technology: understanding people’s non-use of information and communication technologies in everyday life (2003, background): “This has led some commentators to contend that in the long term, the only people not using ICTs will be ‘information want nots’—refusniks who for ideological reasons choose not to engage with ICT despite being able to in practice [43].”
Reconsidering Political and Popular Understandings of the Digital Divide (2004, background): “Similarly, material access to a technology is useless without the requisite skills, knowledge and support to use it effectively (van Dijk, 1999).”