Magnitude scaling of the near fault rupture directivity pulse
By P. Somerville. 2003
531 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Geophysics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c2c323e401e10d85077b32ecaffa94f0f8a77e23
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Civil and Structural Engineering
- Jack W. Baker
- C. Allin Cornell
- Iunio Iervolino
- A. Cornell
- Edoardo Cosenza
- E. Faccioli
- Giuseppe Maddaloni
- N. Luco
In Geophysics
- E. Faccioli
- Iunio Iervolino
- Edoardo Cosenza
- A. Cornell
- C. Allin Cornell
- Giuseppe Maddaloni
- Jack W. Baker
- Julien Rey
Citations in the corpus
- VECTOR-VALUED INTENSITY MEASURES FOR PULSE-LIKE NEAR-FAULT GROUND MOTIONS (2008, methodology): “The required distribution of pulse period as a function of magnitude has been provided by several researchers [6,7,10].”
- Eurocode 8 Compliant Real Record Sets for Seismic Analysis of Structures (2008, background): “Parameters driving the amplitude of the pulses are related to the above-discussed rupture-to-site geometry, while empirical models positively correlating the earthquake’s magnitude to the period of the pulse have been proposed by seismologists [Somerville, 2003].”
- Structure-Specific Scalar Intensity Measures for Near-Source and Ordinary Earthquake Ground Motions (2007, background): “To the extent that this predominant period depends in turn on M (Somerville 2003), Sa T1 may also be insufficient for near-source ground motions.”
- Displacement Spectra for Long Periods (2004, methodology): “Except for a recent study dealing with the influence of the near-fault directivity on response spectra (Somerville 2003), we believe that such long-period features, depending on magnitude and distance, had not been clearly identified in previous studies and, as will be shown later, have some relevan”