Structure-Specific Scalar Intensity Measures for Near-Source and Ordinary Earthquake Ground Motions

By N. Luco, C. Allin Cornell. 2007

1,121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5255a371ef688e552872aed59400564a54bed6a0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Civil and Structural Engineering

Citations in the corpus

Implications of Intensity Measure Selection for Seismic Loss Assessment of 3-D Buildings (2016, methodology): “The efficiency (Luco and Cornell 2007) of each IM presented in Table 1 was compared based on the corresponding conditional dispersion of EDP|IM for each building example at each story level and in the two main directions (Kohrangi et al.”
Vector-valued Intensity Measures Incorporating Spectral Shape For Prediction of Structural Response (2008, background): “The general goals to be considered when choosing an IM are efficiency (minimum variance in EDP for records with the same IM value), sufficiency [ Luco and Cornell, 2005 ], and ease of calculation (eg, it should be possible to obtain the ground motion hazard for the IM, or to determine the IM value o”
Ground-motion models for average spectral acceleration in a period range: direct and indirect methods (2017, background): “…the former feature is referred to as ‘sufficiency’ (i.e., the structural response, conditioned on the chosen IM, is essentially independent of other ground motion properties), and the latter feature is known as ‘efficiency’, i.e., low response variability given the IM (Luco and Cornell 2007).”
Analyzing the Sufficiency of Alternative Scalar and Vector Intensity Measures of Ground Shaking Based on Information Theory (2012, background): “However, it is common to represent uncertainty in ground motion with a probabilistic model for a parameter, or a vector of a few parameters, related to the ground motion and known as an intensity measure (IM) (Luco and Cornell 2007; Jalayer and Cornell 2009; Goulet et al. 2007).”
Bayesian Cloud Analysis: efficient structural fragility assessment using linear regression (2014, methodology): “An information-based relative measure for the sufficiency (Luco and Cornell 2007) of the adopted IM has been derived based on Cloud Method’s underlying probabilistic model in (Jalayer et al. 2012).”
Error estimation of closed‐form solution for annual rate of structural collapse (2008, methodology): “Based on typical values for the dispersion observed in the literature [7-13, 18-20, 26-30] and exceedance rates of collapse that could occur for a wide range of structures [24, 25], a parametric study was performed using β = 0.”
Preliminary ranking of alternative scalar and vector intensity measures of ground shaking (2015, methodology): “In this methodology, uncertainty in the ground motion intensity is described with a scalar parameter, or a low-dimensional vector of parameters, called intensity measure (IM) (Shome et al. 1998; Jalayer and Cornell 2003; Luco and Cornell 2007; Jalayer and Cornell 2009).”
Optimal vector-valued intensity measure for seismic collapse assessment of structures (2015, background): “Other researchers (e.g., Luco and Cornell, 2007; Baker and Cornell, 2008a; Tothong and Cornell, 2008; Bradley et al., 2009a) also applied structural response residuals to test the suffi ciency of different IMs.”
VECTOR-VALUED INTENSITY MEASURES FOR PULSE-LIKE NEAR-FAULT GROUND MOTIONS (2008, background): “Comparison of the IM proposed here to the IM proposed by Luco and Cornell is a topic of current research.”