Microbial growth kinetics

By P. Stanbury, A. Whitaker, S. Hall. 2016

207 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Molecular Biology, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c2a8cea04d40032931b8e550adf5755cbbe8f0b1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Molecular Biology

1. Y. Kuzyakov
2. E. Blagodatskaya
3. John A. Glaser
4. S. Blagodatsky

In Physical and Theoretical Chemistry

1. S. Blagodatsky
2. E. Blagodatskaya
3. Y. Kuzyakov

Citations in the corpus

• Substrate quality affects kinetics and catalytic efficiency of exo-enzymes in rhizosphere and detritusphere (2016, background): “Thus, a lower catalytic efficiency indicated the dominance of zymogenous microbial communities (r-strategists) in 0e10 cm depth as compared with 10e20 cm depth, where the K-strategists relatively dominated (Table 2) (Panikov, 1995; Blagodatskaya et al., 2009).”
• A review of rhizosphere carbon flow modelling (2000, methodology): “This parameter describes the specific rate of energy consumption by living biomass whenµ = 0 (Panikov, 1995), i.e. it quantifies the energy required for metabolism by bacteria in a stated time period when the population is not reproducing.”
• Contrasting effects of glucose, living roots and maize straw on microbial growth kinetics and substrate availability in soil (2009, methodology): “The theory of the microbial growth kinetics has been presented in detail earlier (Panikov, 1995).”
• Biological Degradation of Polymers in the Environment (2019, background): “As the microbial-colonized surface area increases, a faster biodegradation rate will be observed assuming all other environmental conditions to be equal [24].”
• Soil C and N availability determine the priming effect: microbial N mining and stoichiometric decomposition theories (2014, unknown): “We used SIGR approach as it is based on microbial physiology and enables distinguishing total and active biomass fractions along with parameters of microbial growth (Panikov, 1995).”
• Elevated atmospheric CO2 increases microbial growth rates in soil: results of three CO2 enrichment experiments (2010, background): “This approach characterizes the growth rates of whole microbial community according to microbial growth model proposed by Panikov (1995).”
• Biotic controls on CO2 and CH4 exchange in wetlands – a closed environment study (2003, background): “Plant productivity exerts a very important biological control on methane production and this interaction between ecosystem productivity and CH4 formation has been studied at scales ranging from below-ground microbial investigations (Panikov 1995; Thomas et al. 1996), over plot scale flux measurement”
• Microbial hotspots and hot moments in soil: Concept & review (2015, background): “The dominant strategy can be determined by the kinetics and efficiency of microbial growth (Panikov, 1995; Stenstr€ om, 1998; Nocentini et al., 2010).”