A review of rhizosphere carbon flow modelling
By M. Toal, C. Yeomans, K. Killham, Andrew A. Meharg. Plant and Soil, 2000
204 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Plant Science, Soil Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5dce633e54d9927989ce59cf364f8fdb2e79200c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Plant Science
In Soil Science
Citations in the corpus
- Resource Exchange in the Rhizosphere: Molecular Tools and the Microbial Perspective (2006, background): “…na l u se o nl y. RFLP: restriction fragment length polymorphism Such well-controlled biological systems would lend themselves well to integration of empirical results with mathematical modeling (e.g., see Darrah et al. 2006, Tinker & Nye 2000, Toal et al. 2000 and Wu et al. 2005 for reviews).”
- Acquisition of phosphorus and other poorly mobile nutrients by roots. Where do plant nutrition models fail? (2011, background): “As reviewed by Toal et al. (2000) several models of carbon flow are available which integrate at various levels (i) microbial growth, (ii) rhizodeposited C consumption and (iii) physiological state of soil microorganisms.”
- Rhizodeposition of organic C by plants: mechanisms and controls (2003, background): “Indeed, in non-tracer experiments, the comparison between studies is difficult or impossible because the classification of rhizodeposits is not uniform between articles (soluble, insoluble, sugars, total C, etc.) and because results are expressed in a wide range of units [167].”