Simulating regime structures in weather and climate prediction models
By Andrew Dawson, Tim N. Palmer, S. Corti. 2012
139 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c2987be31b062beb9fffcc75399315843cb88ced
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
- Gokhan Danabasoglu
- T. Woollings
- S. Yeager
- Christian L. E. Franzke
- Francisco J. Doblas-Reyes
- Abdelwaheb Hannachi
- H. Teng
- Alicia Karspeck
In Global and Planetary Change
- T. Woollings
- S. Yeager
- Gokhan Danabasoglu
- Christian L. E. Franzke
- Francisco J. Doblas-Reyes
- Abdelwaheb Hannachi
- H. Teng
- Doug M. Smith
Citations in the corpus
- Low‐frequency nonlinearity and regime behavior in the Northern Hemisphere extratropical atmosphere (2017, methodology): “Last but not least, weather regimes have also been used in model evaluation [e.g., Dawson et al., 2012; Dawson and Palmer, 2014].”
- Stochastic climate theory and modeling (2015, unknown): “For instance, Dawson et al. 24 have demonstrated using the ECMWF integrated forecast system that extremely high resolutions (T1279, which corresponds to a grid spacing of about 16km) are required to accurately simulate the observed Northern hemispheric circulation regime structure.”
- Machine learning and artificial intelligence to aid climate change research and preparedness (2019, background): “An application in climate sciences of this unsupervised approach would be estimating the number of distinct North Atlantic weather regimes (Dawson et al 2012).”
- Decadal climate prediction: an update from the trenches (2014, background): “For example, a great improvement in the representation of the quasipersistent Euro-Atlantic flow regimes is found with increasing model resolution (Dawson et al. 2012).”