The advantages of partialling perfectionistic strivings and perfectionistic concerns: Critical issues and recommendations

By Joachim Stoeber, Patrick Gaudreau. 2017

174 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c2929baf4f1623cc12530640bdf4674d6695a8b8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. M. Back
2. Jameson K. Hirsch
3. D. Molnar
4. F. Sirois
5. Gareth E. Jowett
6. Sarah H. Mallinson-Howard
7. A. Hill
8. R. Kitner

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

1. M. Back
2. Jameson K. Hirsch
3. D. Molnar
4. F. Sirois
5. A. Hill
6. R. Kitner
7. Natalia Tosti
8. Katrin B. Klingsieck

In Sociology and Political Science

1. A. Hill
2. M. Back
3. D. Molnar
4. Jameson K. Hirsch
5. F. Sirois

Citations in the corpus

• Multidimensional Perfectionism in Sport: A Meta-Analytical Review (2018, background): “What findings regarding residual PS allow us to conclude has recently been subject to debate (Hill, 2014, 2017; Stoeber & Gaudreau, 2017).”
• A Meta–Analytic and Conceptual Update on the Associations between Procrastination and Multidimensional Perfectionism (2017, background): “Thus, Stoeber and Gaudreau (2017) advocate for researchers to use partialling techniques to assess how ‘pure’ perfectionistic strivings are associated with key outcomes of interest.”