Rural tourism and the development of less favoured areas—between rhetoric and practice

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The dimensions of rural tourism experience: impacts on arousal, memory, and satisfaction (2018, result): “The sample profile shows a majority of female respondents (65.1%), with a tertiary education degree (88.4%), which might have slightly biased results, although the rural tourist market tends to reveal a profile of highly educated travelers in Portugal (Kastenholz, 2004; Ribeiro & Marques, 2002).”
Who is consuming the countryside? An activity-based segmentation analysis of the domestic rural tourism market in Portugal (2017, unknown): “2014; Molera & Albaladejo, 2007; Murphy, 2014; Opperman, 1996; Perkins, MacKay, & Espiner, 2015; Park, Lee, & Yoon, 2014; Pesonen & Komppula, 2010; Pesonen, 2015; Ribeiro & Marques, 2002; Sidali & Schulz, 2010), can also be identified in Portugal.”
Rural tourism: A systematic literature review on definitions and challenges (2021, unknown): “Overall, the majority of the case studies focused on Spain (11%), Portugal and the United Kingdom (10% each), then China (8”
Urban-rural imbalance and Tourism-Led Growth in China (2017, background): “…sketched background, tourism is promoted as a favourable option to promote the boom of less developed regions (Brau, Lanza, & Pigliaru, 2007; MacDonald & Jolliffe, 2003; Ribeiro & Marques, 2002), which is also considered as one of the major instruments for poverty relief in China (CNTA, 2016b).”