Recent advances in bacterial cellulose production

By M. Shoda, Y. Sugano. 2005

349 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review (2010, methodology): “More detailed discussion of BC preparation and use is presented elsewhere (Iguchi et al. 2000; Brown 2004; El-Saied et al. 2004; Shoda and Sugano 2005; Wan et al. 2006).”
The Potential of NanoCellulose in the Packaging Field: A Review (2015, neutral): “50 0– 20 00 15 H 2 S O 4 T E M [1 22 ]”
An alternative carbon source from konjac powder for enhancing production of bacterial cellulose in static cultures by a model strain Acetobacter aceti subsp. xylinus ATCC 23770 (2008, neutral): “…has been demonstrated from glucose, sucrose, fructose, glycerol, mannitol and arabitol, among which mannitol and fructose are better carbon sources (Masaoka, Ohe, & Sakota, 1993; Oikawa, Morino, & Ameyama, 1995; Oikawa, Ohtori, & Ameyama, 1995; Ross, Mayer, & Benziman, 1991; Shoda & Sugano, 2005).”
Cellulose-Based Bio- and Nanocomposites: A Review (2011, background): “gained attention in the research area for the encouraging properties it possesses; such as its significant mechanical properties in both dry and wet states, porosity, water absorbency, moldability, biodegradability, and excellent biological affinity [62].”