Fungal diversity in ectomycorrhizal communities: sampling effort and species detection
By Andy F. S. Taylor. Plant and Soil, 2002
249 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c27dc66435f2315e093211149a22e63284f0e577
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- David W. Johnson
- J. Leake
- D. Read
- Lynne Boddy
- G. Muckle
- Damian P. Donnelly
- C. Azcón-Aguilar
- C. M. Navarro-Fernández
In Insect Science
- J. Leake
- J. Barea
- C. Azcón-Aguilar
- R. Henrik Nilsson
- K. Martin
- P. Cornejo
- Martin Bidartondo
- Lynne Boddy
In Plant Science
- J. Barea
- C. Azcón-Aguilar
- R. Azcón
- J. Leake
- David W. Johnson
- Lynne Boddy
- Damian P. Donnelly
- G. Muckle
Citations in the corpus
- Fungal-specific PCR primers developed for analysis of the ITS region of environmental DNA extracts (2005, background): “Analysis of natural populations of ectomycorrhizas requires high rates of sampling because of the high number of fungal species involved and the high spatial variability observed in natural systems [3,4].”
- Networks of power and influence: the role of mycorrhizal mycelium in controlling plant communities and agroecosystem functioning (2004, background): “EM diversity, biomass, and fruit-body production are adversely affected by N enrichment (Erland and Taylor 2002).”
- Molecular mechanisms of plant and microbe coexistence (2008, methodology): “A number of approaches have been used to characterize protein space, including fold family trees (Efimov 1997; Zhang and Kim 2000), a periodic table of structures (Taylor 2002), or taxonomies based on secondary structure (Przytycka et al.”
- Waiting for fungi: the ectomycorrhizal invasion of lowland heathlands (2009, background): “However, these studies were conducted on agricultural soil and relied mainly on fungal fruiting body surveys which can poorly represent a site’s ectomycorrhizal diversity (Taylor & Alexander 1990; Gardes & Bruns 1996; Jonsson et al. 1999; Horton & Bruns 2001; Taylor 2002; Nara et al. 2003b) and to a”
- Variation in forest soil fungal diversity along a latitudinal gradient (2013, background): “However, the majority of past studies have been based on the collection of sporocarps, which is not as accurate as high sequencing technologies for quantitative analyses, as sporocarp production can be variable and is dependent on a variety of factors, often giving an unreliable view of EcMF communi”
- Ecological and functional roles of mycorrhizas in semi-arid ecosystems of Southeast Spain (2011, methodology): “Although molecular techniques have gained prominence, identification approaches based on morphological criteria are still important and complement molecular methods (El Karkouri et al., 2005; Morton, 2009; Oehl et al., 2009; Taylor, 2002).”
- 454 Pyrosequencing analyses of forest soils reveal an unexpectedly high fungal diversity. (2009, background): “…in forest soils are affected by numerous biotic and abiotic factors, including seasons, soil characteristics, stand age and host tree species (Nordén & Paltto, 2001; Peter et al., 2001; Dickie et al., 2002; Buée et al., 2005; Genney et al., 2005; Koide et al., 2007; Tedersoo et al., 2008).”