Photometric redshifts from evolutionary synthesis with PÉGASE: The code Z-PEG and the z=0 age constraint

By D. L. Borgne, Brigitte Rocca-Volmerange Institut d'astrophysique de Paris, I. D. Spatiale. 2002

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Photometric redshifts are estimated on the basis of template scenarios with the help of the code Z-PEG, an extension of the galaxy evolution model P EGASE.2 and available on the P EGASE web site. The spectral energy distribution (SED) templates are computed for nine spectral types including starburst, irregular, spiral and elliptical. Dust, extinction and metal eects are coherently taken into account, depending on evolution scenarios. The sensitivity of results to adding near-infrared colors and IGM absorption is analyzed. A comparison with results of other models without evolution measures the evolution factor which systematically increases the estimated photometric redshift values byz 0:2 for z> 1:5. Moreover we systematically check that the evolution scenarios match observational standard templates of nearby galaxies, implying an age constraint of the stellar population at z = 0 for each type. The respect of this constraint makes it possible to signicantly improve the accuracy of photometric redshifts by decreasing the well-known degeneracy problem. The method is applied to the HDF-N sample (see in Fern andez-Soto et al. 1999). From ts on SED templates by a 2 -minimization procedure, not only is the photometric redshift derived but also the corresponding spectral type and the formation redshift zfor when stars rst formed. Early epochs of galaxy formationzfor > 5 are found from this new method and results are compared to faint galaxy count interpretations. The new tool is available at: http://www.iap.fr/pegase

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c2671447a7eb6adb8f03b67b570ddbe56c813fea

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. D. M. Alexander
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. Mark Dickinson
  4. E. Daddi
  5. P. Hopkins
  6. D. Elbaz
  7. P. V. van Dokkum
  8. C. Conroy

In Instrumentation

  1. Mark Dickinson
  2. E. Daddi
  3. D. M. Alexander
  4. D. Elbaz
  5. C. Conroy
  6. P. V. van Dokkum
  7. Richard S. Ellis
  8. A. Renzini

Citations in the corpus