Differential use of visual and chemical cues in predator recognition and threat-sensitive predator-avoidance responses by larval newts (Notophthalmus viridescens)

By A. Mathis, F. Vincent. 2000

131 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c263c6b815e3d75ef9c788653a47ec71c86afe49

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Threat-sensitive predator avoidance by slimy sculpins: understanding the importance of visual versus chemical information (2001, background): “In one study , Mathis and Vincent ( 2000 ) showed that newt ( Notophthalmus viridescens ) larvae distin - guished between predatory salamander ( Ambystoma tigrinum ) larvae and nonpredatory tadpoles ( Hyla chrysoscelis / versicolor ) , but only when chemical cues were available .”
Predation risk assessment by olfactory and visual cues in a coral reef fish (2008, background): “…in freshwater amphibia suggests that chemical cues may play a more important role than visual or other stimuli (e.g., StauVer and Semlitsch 1993; Kiesecker et al. 1996; Mathis and Vincent 2000), in part attributable to the low visual acuity of the study organisms (Mathis and Vincent 2000).”
Innate and Learned Predator Recognition Mediated by Chemical Signals in Eurycea nana (2008, background): “This response is consistent with predator avoidance behaviors exhibited by other amphibian prey species (e.g. Griffiths et al. 1998; Mathis & Vincent 2000; Mathis et al. 2003; Mandrillon & Saglio 2005).”
Wall lizards combine chemical and visual cues of ambush snake predators to avoid overestimating risk inside refuges (2004, unknown): “These suggest that prey can combine information from both chemical and visual cues to make a better assessment of the level of risk under conflicting situations (Vanderstighelen 1987; Hartman & Abrahams 2000; Mathis & Vincent 2000; Chivers et al.”
Learning threat-sensitive predator avoidance: how do fathead minnows incorporate conflicting information? (2006, background): “…2005 The Association for the S (Holomuzki & Short 1990), mayflies (McIntosh et al. 1999), amphibians (Kats et al. 1994; Anholt et al. 1996; Mathis & Vincent 2000; Amo et al. 2004) and fish (Williams & Brown 1991; Hartman & Abrahams 2000; Chivers et al. 2001; Golub & Brown 2003; Marcus &…”
Chemically Mediated Strategies to Counter Predation (2003, background): “Interactions between sensory modality, context, and ontogeny seem particularly promising (Mathis and Vincent, 2000).”
The nose knows: minnows determine predator proximity and density through detection of predator odours (2006, background): “This hypothesis has been tested and validated many times in a wide range of taxa, including freshwater isopods (Holomuzki & Short 1990), mayflies (McIntosh et al. 1999), crustaceans (Wahle 1992), amphibians (Kats et al. 1994; Anholt et al. 1996; Puttlitz et al. 1999; Mathis & Vincent 2000; Amo et ”