Implicit Regularization of Discrete Gradient Dynamics in Deep Linear Neural Networks
By Gauthier Gidel, Francis R. Bach, Simon Lacoste-Julien. 2019
198 citations recorded by the source corpus.
When optimizing over-parameterized models, such as deep neural networks, a large set of parameters can achieve zero training error. In such cases, the choice of the optimization algorithm and its respective hyper-parameters introduces biases that will lead to convergence to specific minimizers of the objective. Consequently, this choice can be considered as an implicit regularization for the training of over-parametrized models. In this work, we push this idea further by studying the discrete gradient dynamics of the training of a two-layer linear network with the least-squares loss. Using a time rescaling, we show that, with a vanishing initialization and a small enough step size, this dynamics sequentially learns the solutions of a reduced-rank regression with a gradually increasing rank.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computational Mechanics, Scaling & Learning Theory
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Yoshua Bengio
- Ruslan Salakhutdinov
- Sergey Levine
- Quoc V. Le
- Percy Liang
- Mohit Bansal
- Kyunghyun Cho
- Aaron C. Courville
In Computational Mechanics
- Yoshua Bengio
- Aaron C. Courville
- Pascal Vincent
- Noam Razin
- Wei Hu
- Nadav Cohen
- Sanjeev Arora
- Simon Lacoste-Julien
In Scaling & Learning Theory
- Wei Hu
- Lechao Xiao
- Jeffrey Pennington
- Aaron C. Courville
- Pascal Vincent
- Sanjeev Arora
- Greg Yang
- Nadav Cohen
Citations in the corpus
- The Surprising Simplicity of the Early-Time Learning Dynamics of Neural Networks (2020, background): “Another line of work has identified that deep linear networks gradually increase the rank during training [Arora et al., 2019a, Saxe et al., 2014, Lampinen and Ganguli, 2018, Gidel et al., 2019].”
- Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distribution (2022, unknown): “Two-layer linear networks are widely studied in the literature on implicit regularization (Saxe et al., 2014; Gunasekar et al., 2017; Gidel et al., 2019; Arora et al., 2018).”
- Implicit Regularization via Neural Feature Alignment (2020, background): “…this aspect of the non-linear dynamics as favoring a sequentialization of learning across patterns of different complexity (‘easy patterns first’), a phenomenon analogous to one pointed out in the context of deep linear networks (Saxe et al., 2014; Lampinen et al., 2018; Gidel et al., 2019).”
- A Sample Complexity Separation between Non-Convex and Convex Meta-Learning (2020, methodology): “[2014] and Gidel et al. [2019].”
- Implicit Regularization in Deep Matrix Factorization (2019, background): “[19] Gauthier Gidel, Francis Bach, and Simon Lacoste-Julien.”
- Gradient Starvation: A Learning Proclivity in Neural Networks (2020, background): “[90, 2, 32] provide closed-form equations for the dynamics of linear networks in terms of the principal components of the input covariance matrix.”
- Implicit Regularization in Deep Learning May Not Be Explainable by Norms (2020, background): “[25] Gauthier Gidel, Francis Bach, and Simon Lacoste-Julien.”
- Gradient Descent Maximizes the Margin of Homogeneous Neural Networks (2019, background): “Other related works include [Ma et al., 2017, Gidel et al., 2019, Arora et al., 2019a, Suggala et al., 2018, Blanc et al., 2019, Banburski et al., 2019, Neyshabur et al., 2014, 2015].”
- When MAML Can Adapt Fast and How to Assist When It Cannot (2019, background): “While linear layers are often cited for implicit regularization to improve generalization of models, (Gidel et al., 2019; Saxe et al., 2019) in our settings, there is no overfitting.”