Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products. : Social and socio-economic LCA guidelines complementing environmental LCA and Life Cycle Costing, contributing to the full assessment of…

By Evan J. Andrews, L. Barthel, Tabea Beck, C. Benoît, A. Ciroth, C. Cucuzzella, C. Gensch, Julie S. Hébert, Pascal Lesage, A. Manhart and 12 more. 2009

561 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c1fb37ff463703fe57b6d6c1949b0c0361993958

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Resilient and sustainable supply chain design: sustainability analysis under disruption risks (2018, methodology): “For this purpose, the metrics defined by environmental impact assessment methods (e.g. IMPACT 2002+ (Jolliet et al. 2003), Eco-indicator 99 (Goedkoop, Heijungs, and Huijbregts 2009) and CML2001 (Guinée et al. 2001)) and social performance standards (e.g. SA8000 (SA 2008), GRI (GRI 2011), GSLCAP (Ben”
Strong sustainable consumption governance – precondition for a degrowth path? (2013, background): “While a first approach has been made to develop guidelines for such an approach (UNEP, 2009), there is an urgent need for carrying out such”
Exploring the Current Challenges and Opportunities of Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (2019, methodology): “The United Nations Environment Program and the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (UNEP/SETAC) Life Cycle Initiative works on the harmonization of LCA through the four stages of goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, impact assessment, and interpretation [13].”