Reliable determination of chemical state in x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy based on sample-work-function referencing to adventitious carbon: Resolving the myth of apparent constant binding energy…

By G. Greczynski, L. Hultman. Applications of Surface Science, 2018

1,322 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract The accuracy of chemical-state determination by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) used in contemporary advanced materials research relies on a trustworthy binding energy (BE) referencing method. The C 1s peak corresponding to C C/C H bonds of adventitious carbon (AdC), present on a majority of air-exposed samples, is most commonly employed for this purpose, irrespective of whether samples are electrically conducting or not. Contrary to conventional practice, which takes the BE of C 1s peak of AdC as a constant, we find that the C 1s peak position E B F varies over an alarmingly large range, from 284.08 to 286.74 eV, depending on the substrate, for nearly a hundred predominantly thin-film samples comprising metals, nitrides, carbides, borides, oxides, and oxynitrides. Our consistent measurements also show that, independent of materials system, E B F of the C 1s peak is closely correlated to the sample work function ϕ SA , such that the sum E B F + ϕ SA is constant, indicating that the electronic levels of the AdC layer align to the vacuum level, rather than to the Fermi level as commonly assumed. This phenomenon can be understood given that the AdC layer is not an inherent part of the analyzed sample and that the interaction to the substrate is weak, showing in that a common Fermi level is not established at the interface. Thus, a straightforward complementary measurement of ϕ SA enables using the C 1s peak of AdC for the purpose of BE–scale calibration for samples exhibiting decent electrical conductivity. This new practice resolves problems associated with the conventional method and allows for more reliable bonding assignments. It is thus advisable that both ASTM and ISO XPS referencing guides relying on the use of AdC should be reviewed.

Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Surfaces, Coatings and Films

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c1abb64c4434e3d5c97f025c17db82c95ec69c3f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

  1. G. Greczynski
  2. L. Hultman

In Materials Chemistry

  1. G. Greczynski
  2. L. Hultman
  3. Yury Gogotsi
  4. Michel W. Barsoum
  5. A. Anders

In Surfaces, Coatings and Films

  1. G. Greczynski
  2. L. Hultman

Citations in the corpus