Neuropsychological correlates of decision-making in ambiguous and risky situations

By Matthias Brand, Kirsten Labudda, Hans Joachim Markowitsch. Neural Networks, 2006

490 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, General Decision Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c1a4365483079eb6724eedcc1f2ac71934488dfb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Elke U. Weber
2. Bernd Figner
3. F. Wilkening
4. Rachael J. Mackinlay

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Bernd Figner
2. Elke U. Weber
3. F. Wilkening
4. Rachael J. Mackinlay
5. B. Casey
6. Rebecca M. Jones
7. Ryan O. Murphy

In General Decision Sciences

1. Bernd Figner
2. Elke U. Weber
3. F. Wilkening
4. Rachael J. Mackinlay
5. B. Casey
6. S. van der Linden
7. Dan Kahan
8. Rebecca M. Jones

Citations in the corpus

• Affective and deliberative processes in risky choice: age differences in risk taking in the Columbia Card Task. (2009, background): “For example, Brand, Labudda, and Markowitsch (2006) noted that the IGT confounded decisions under ambiguity and under risk, gradually switching from the former to the latter during an individual’s testing session.”