Affective and deliberative processes in risky choice: age differences in risk taking in the Columbia Card Task.

By Bernd Figner, Rachael J. Mackinlay, F. Wilkening, Elke U. Weber. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition, 2009

697 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, General Decision Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/36c2f6cd6cdf976cf3d722ad75e451eb8c186a86

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In General Decision Sciences

Citations in the corpus

Neurobiology of the Adolescent Brain and Behavior (2010, positive): “Seminal animal and human works have shown how striatal and prefrontal cortical regions shape goal-directed behavior.(7,28,38,39,45) Using single-unit recordings in monkeys, Pasupathy and Miller(46) demonstrated that when flexibly learning a set of reward contingencies, very early activity in the str”
Personality and Risk Taking (2015, background): “Figner, Weber, and colleagues developed a ‘ hot ’ affective and a ‘ cold ’ deliberative version of a risky choice task (the Columbia Card Task, CCT; Figner et al., 2009; Figner and Weber, 2011) and showed that age and other individual differences are not uniform across these types of risk-taking sit”
The Decision Making Individual Differences Inventory and guidelines for the study of individual differences in judgment and decision-making research (2011, background): “, 2002), Columbia Card Task (CCT; Figner et al., 2009), Cups Task (Levin & Hart, 2003; Levin et al.”
Using Skin Conductance in Judgment and Decision Making Research (2011, methodology): “(see Figner et al., 2009).”
Adolescent risky decision-making: Neurocognitive development of reward and control regions (2010, background): “However, adolescents show more risky behavior than adults when the experimental task is arousing; for example, when peers are present (Gardner and Steinberg, 2005), or when it stresses affective rather than deliberative processing (Figner et al., 2009).”
Adolescent neurodevelopment. (2013, background): “when both emotional and non-emotional versions of a risk-taking task were examined, adolescents exhibited more risk-taking than adults only under the emotional version of the task (68).”
Frontostriatal Maturation Predicts Cognitive Control Failure to Appetitive Cues in Adolescents (2011, background): “Laboratory demonstrations of biased approach motivation in adolescents (see also Figner, Mackinlay, Wilkening, & Weber, 2009 ) bolster the conclusion that adolescent risk-taking behavior is not simply a function of changes in independence or societal treatment (eg, Epstein, 2007 ; for further disc”