The Governance of University Knowledge Transfer: A Critical Review of the Literature

By Aldo Geuna, A. Muscio. 2009

569 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c178394bfd9b95fff184712d4e78bc3ae834db17

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Changes to university IPR regulations in Europe and the impact on academic patenting (2010, background): “…in Europe, the organizational and cultural changes that have accompanied the changes to the regulations on IPR ownership at universities, have had a major impact on university patenting activity, and an even greater impact than the changes in the regulations on their own (Geuna and Muscio, 2009).”
Mapping the field: a bibliometric analysis of the literature on university–industry collaborations (2017, background): “In addition to identifying types of interaction channels and knowledge transfer mechanisms, research belonging to this cluster provides an in-depth analysis of the incentives and the associated determinants regarding the choice towards a specific channel (Geuna and Muscio 2009).”
Finding the Right Partners: Institutional and personal modes of governance of university-industry interactions (2013, background): “It has been pointed out that at least two different models of governance of universityindustry interactions have developed over time and now are co-existing (Geuna and Muscio, 2009).”
The research university, entrepreneurship and regional development: Research propositions and current evidence (2012, background): “Immediate impact is difficult to assess when indicators, such as patents and university spin-offs, are used (Geuna and Muscio 2009) given that revenues from paid consultancy can be higher even in the most elite universities (HEFCE 2010).”
Beneath the tip of the iceberg: exploring the multiple forms of university–industry linkages (2011, unknown): “Therefore, firm demand and receptivity are important in explaining the variety of models (Geuna and Muscio 2009).”
Knowledge exchange: a comparison of policies, strategies, and funding incentives in English and Scottish higher education (2013, background): “Academics get involved with different forms of KE and external engagement, and it is pointed out that this is done mostly through ‘spontaneous, endogenous’ activities (Geuna and Muscio 2009: 109).”
Does government funding complement or substitute private research funding to universities (2013, unknown): “…such as research contracts and consultancies in their various mostly focuses, recalling the theoretical basis provided by Arrow (1962), on the impact of public R&D contracts and grants upon private R&D investment by manufacturing ﬁrms and industries (David and Hall, 2000; David et al., 2000).”
Perceived Obstacles to University–Industry Collaboration: Results from a Qualitative Survey of Italian Academic Departments (2014, background): “Since the early 1980s, several European country governments have been encouraging universities to raise research funding from industry and to contribute actively to industry innovation (Geuna 1999; Geuna and Muscio 2009).”
University knowledge and firm innovation: evidence from European countries (2014, background): “…have analyzed the transfer of knowledge generated in such relationships, centering their attention on the variety of knowledge transfer mechanisms (Bekkers and Bodas Freitas 2008; D’Este and Patel 2007; Geuna and Muscio 2009; Landry et al. 2010) and on the characteristics of involved actors.”
Entrepreneurial Universities (2013, background): “For example, Geuna and Muscio (2009) identified that the European entrepreneurial universities have engaged several initiatives to develop efficient infrastructures in order to ease the transfer of knowledge and increase the level of interaction with the industry.”