Personality and foraging decisions in fallow deer, Dama dama
By U. A. Bergvall, Alexander Schäpers, P. Kjellander, Alexander Weiss. 2011
135 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Small Animals
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c15eeb974563e497b5d9383cfaee8eea2c0961c3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Robert Heinsohn
- Alex Thornton
- Alecia J. Carter
- Nicola S. Clayton
- Harry H. Marshall
- A. Greggor
- G. Cowlishaw
In Small Animals
Citations in the corpus
- Neophobia is not only avoidance: improving neophobia tests by combining cognition and ecology (2015, background): “[19]), particularly when they come to opposite conclusions about whether object neophobia correlates with a latency to eat novel food.”
- Animal personality: what are behavioural ecologists measuring? (2013, methodology): “Burns (2008; but see also Bergvall et al., 2011; Carter et al., 2012b) measured the responses of individual guppies (Poecilia reticulata) to three experiments intended to measure boldness: an open-field test, an emergence test and a novel-object test (Table 2).”
- How not to measure boldness: novel object and antipredator responses are not the same in wild baboons (2012, unknown): “…et al. 2005) and novel environments (Brown & Braithwaite 2004; Dingemanse et al. 2004), and by observer assessment under natural conditions (Wielebnowski 1999; Bergvall et al. 2011; Carter et al. 2012; these methods are reviewed in Gosling 2001; Vazire et al. 2007; Uher 2008a; Toms et al. 2010).”