How not to measure boldness: novel object and antipredator responses are not the same in wild baboons
By Alecia J. Carter, Harry H. Marshall, Robert Heinsohn, G. Cowlishaw. 2012
201 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3c8adf709d85a26e2e3c8431dc0971eb6dd15120
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Robert Heinsohn
- Alex Thornton
- Alecia J. Carter
- Nicola S. Clayton
- Harry H. Marshall
- A. Greggor
- G. Cowlishaw
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Neophobia is not only avoidance: improving neophobia tests by combining cognition and ecology (2015, background): “Accordingly, sometimes other fear-related behaviours correlate with neophobia [61], and other times they do not [62,63], potentially indicating situations where neophobic responses are influenced by information processing, not fear.”
- Fish behavioral types and their ecological consequences (2014, unknown): “A similar result was found when investigating two measures that are often assumed to quantify boldness (i.e., response to a novel object and response to a predator; Carter et al. 2012).”
- Animal personality: what are behavioural ecologists measuring? (2013, methodology): “For example, are all individual baboons (Papio ursinus) that handle a novel food item for longer than 150 s equally bold (Carter et al., 2012a)?”