The Protégé OWL Plugin: An Open Development Environment for Semantic Web Applications
By Holger Knublauch, Ray W. Fergerson, Natasha Noy, Mark A. Musen. International Workshop on the Semantic Web, 2004
1,090 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bc789dd9732d7b3a64cea5c880b0651bd3827915
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Ian Horrocks
- Matthew Horridge
- Sean Bechhofer
- Evren Sirin
- Ljiljana Stojanović
- Katia P. Sycara
- Franz Baader
- Baris Sertkaya
In Information Systems
- Ian Horrocks
- Matthew Horridge
- Sean Bechhofer
- Katia P. Sycara
- Ljiljana Stojanović
- Evren Sirin
- Sheila A. McIlraith
- Naveen Kumar Srinivasan
In Molecular Biology
- Ian Horrocks
- Matthew Horridge
- Franz Baader
- Sean Bechhofer
- Baris Sertkaya
- Anni-Yasmin Turhan
- Ljiljana Stojanović
- Peter Haase
Citations in the corpus
- Web ontology segmentation: analysis, classification and use (2006, background): “The resultant long chains of equivalent classes, while not wrong, are difficult to view in ontology editors (such as Protégé OWL [14]).”
- Computing the Least Common Subsumer w.r.t. a Background Terminology (2004, background): “Editors—such as OilEd [16] and the OWL plug-in of Protégé [42]—supporting the design of ontologies in various application domains usually allow their users to access a DL reasoner, which realizes the aforementioned standard inferences such as subsumption and instance checking.”
- Consistent Evolution of OWL Ontologies (2005, methodology): “For example, the OWL Protege Plugin [ 11 ] provides species validation including explanations where certain problems occurred.”
- FaCT++ Description Logic Reasoner: System Description (2006, background): “A key motivation for basing ontology languages on DLs is that DL systems can then be used to provide computational services for ontology tools and applications [8, 9].”
- The Protégé Project: A Look Back and a Look Forward (2015, methodology): “We had been tracking the emerging OWL speci.cation, and Holger Knublauch, then a post-doctoral fellow in our laboratory, worked with the rest of the team to extend Protégé to create what was, at the time, the only ontology-development platform that could accommodate nearly the complete OWL speci.c”
- Bringing Semantics to Web Services with OWL-S (2007, methodology): “The OWL-S Editor [25], a plug-in to the popular ontology development tool Protégé [38], provides a comprehensive set of capabilities for creating and maintaining OWL-S service descriptions.”
- The OWL API: A Java API for OWL ontologies (2011, methodology): “Since its initial development in 2003 [7], the OWL API has been used in multiple development projects, including Protégé-4 [26], SWOOP [24], the NeOn Toolkit [17] 2 , OWLSight 3 , OntoTrack [27], the Pellet reasoner [38] 4 and a number of online validation and conversion services 5 .”