CO2 emission trading within the European Union and Annex B countries: the cement industry case
By L. Szabó, Ignacio Hidalgo, J. Ciscar, Antonio Soria. 2006
162 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Finance
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c10c4ba1fc873f5c07c4bc4d224165e375ea7c72
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Environmental Engineering
In Finance
Citations in the corpus
- The Endogenous Price Dynamics of Emission Allowances and an Application to CO2 Option Pricing (2012, unknown): “Therefore, the first abatement alternative can be considered as the exception rather than the rule (see Hidalgo et al. (2005) and Szabö et al. (2006) for a more comprehensive discussion).”
- Carbon allowance auction design of China's emissions trading scheme: A multi-agent-based approach (2017, background): “…(2008) investigated the impacts of ETS only on iron and steel industry, Dormady (2014) for energy sector, Pentelow and Scott (2011) for tourism industry, Anger (2010) for aviation industry, Szabó et al. (2006) and Deja et al. (2010) for cement industry, and Cong and Wei (2010) for power sector.”
- Carbon emissions trading scheme exploration in China: A multi-agent-based model (2015, methodology): “For example, in the study of Chappin and Dijkema (2009) and Sichao et al. (2010), only the power sector was considered in the CET analysis; in Anger (2010), the aviation industry; and in Deja et al. (2010) and Szabó et al. (2006), the cement industry.”
- CO2 abatement, competitiveness and leakage in the European cement industry under the EU ETS: grandfathering versus output-based allocation (2006, background): “CEMSIM is a bottom-up model of the cement industry, developed by the IPTS (Szabo et al., 2003, 2006).”
- Potential impact of (CET) carbon emissions trading on China’s power sector: A perspective from different allowance allocation options (2010, background): “developed a global dynamic simulation model of the cement industry, quantifying the benefit achieved from emission trading in different markets (EU15, EU27 and Annex B) and assessing the magnitude of the potential carbon leakage effect [13].”
- Waste glass in the production of cement and concrete – A review (2014, background): “[25] concluded that the global CO2 emission from cement industry will increase by more than 50% by 2030 due to the increase in the production rate of cement annually.”
- Recent update on the environmental impact of geopolymers (2016, background): “Furthermore, the rapid urban development in emerging countries will push forward the cement demand and recent studies estimate that cement production could represent 10 to 15% of global CO2 emissions by 2020 [2].”
- EU emissions trading and the cement sector: a spatial competition analysis (2008, background): “Similarly, firms which produce in more than one geographical region may (or may not) require their production plants to cooperate rather than to compete for customers.16 Szabo et al. (2003, 2006) have modelled in detail the potential impact of emissions trading on the cement industry.”
- A system dynamics model for analyzing energy consumption and CO2 emission in Iranian cement industry under various production and export scenarios (2013, background): “Many researchers have studied energy consumption and CO2 emission in cement industry (Riccardi et al., 2012; Szabo et al., 2006; Hasanbeigi et al., 2010a, 2010b).”