CO2 abatement, competitiveness and leakage in the European cement industry under the EU ETS: grandfathering versus output-based allocation

By D. Demailly, Philippe Quirion. 2006

321 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9a8b9955436f98916c2a4f89441b457b3659886d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Environmental Engineering

Citations in the corpus

Firm performance and employment in the EU emissions trading scheme : An empirical assessment for Germany (2008, background): “The sectoral competitiveness implications of allowance allocation under the EU ETS have been assessed both for the European electricity industry (Neuhoff et al., 2006) and for the cement sector (Demailly and Quirion, 2006).”
The Impact of Carbon Trading on Industry: Evidence from German Manufacturing Firms (2014, methodology): “Our study has focused on Germany, the largest economy in the EU ETS, its largest emitter, and a leading exporter of manufactured goods in the world.”
Emissions trading: lessons learnt from the 1st phase of the EU ETS and prospects for the 2nd phase (2006, background): “…of this approach have claimed that giving all installations free allowances according to their need will, whilst maintaining efficient incentives in the emissions market, address distributional and competitiveness concerns of the covered sectors and prevent firms from increasing product prices.”
The Global Effects of Subglobal Climate Policies (2010, background): “Some of these studies focus just on specific energy intensive, trade exposed sectors like cement (Ponssard and Walker 2008; Demailly and Quirion 2006), steel (Demailly and Quirion 2008a; Gielen and Moriguchi 2002), or just energy intensive sectors (Demailly and Quirion 2008a; Fischer and Fox 2009a).”
Market-Based Emissions Regulation and Industry Dynamics (2016, background): “For example, Demailly and Quirion ð2006Þ and Szabo et al. ð2006Þ use a bottom-up model of the cement industry to examine impacts of alternative policy designs on industry profits, emissions, and emissions leakage.”
On the empirical content of carbon leakage criteria in the EU emissions trading scheme (2014, methodology): “4Extending earlier work by Demailly and Quirion (2006) on the cement sector, Monjon and Quirion (2011) use a computable partial equilibrium model to compare border adjustments and output based allocation.”
Border adjustment for European emissions trading: Competitiveness and carbon leakage (2010, background): “Demailly and Quirion (2006) and Ponssard and Walker (2008), for example report potentially high rates of leakage for the European cement industry under the EU ETS.”
EU emissions trading and the cement sector: a spatial competition analysis (2008, background): “Demailly and Quirion (2005) have combined CEMSIM with a global transport model to derive predictions about patterns of cement trade.”
Sector-based approach to the post-2012 climate change policy architecture (2008, background): “The extent of this cost differential and impact on competitiveness depends on a variety of factors, some of which have been detailed in Grubb and Neuhoff (2006) and Demailly and Quirion (2006).”