Decentralized consensus optimization with asynchrony and delays
By Tianyu Wu, Kun Yuan, Qing Ling, Wotao Yin, Ali H. Sayed. 2016
134 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Mathematical Optimization
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Mathematical Optimization
Citations in the corpus
- Central Server Free Federated Learning over Single-sided Trust Social Networks (2019, background): “Wu et al. (2017); Shen et al. (2018) shows that the decentralized SGD would converge with a comparable convergence rate to the centralized algorithm with less communication to make large-scale model training feasible.”
- Robust and Communication-Efficient Collaborative Learning (2019, background): “Another line of work proposes asynchronous decentralized SGD, where the workers update their models based on the last iterates received by their neighbors (Recht et al., 2011; Lian et al., 2017b; Lan and Zhou, 2018; Peng et al., 2016; Wu et al., 2017; Dutta et al., 2018).”
- Qsparse-Local-SGD: Distributed SGD With Quantization, Sparsification, and Local Computations (2019, background): “This is different from asynchronous algorithms studied for stragglers [WYL + 18, RRWN11], where only one gradient step is taken but occurs at different times due to delays.”
- Decentralized Online Learning: Take Benefits from Others’ Data without Sharing Your Own to Track Global Trend (2019, background): “It is assumed to be a doubly stochastic matrix [34, 39, 40] but not necessarily symmetric.”
- COLA: Decentralized Linear Learning (2018, methodology): “For the decentralized, asynchronous consensus optimization, [Wu et al., 2018] extends the existing PG-EXTRA and proves convergence of the algorithm.”
- Asynchronous Decentralized Parallel Stochastic Gradient Descent (2017, methodology): “1 Decentralized algorithms are mainly studied as consensus optimization problems by the control community [Ram et al., 2010, Yan et al., 2013, Yuan et al., 2016] for the application scenario where only a decentralized network is available.”
- Towards More Efficient Stochastic Decentralized Learning: Faster Convergence and Sparse Communication (2018, methodology): “Inspired by (Wu et al., 2016), we introduce the positive definite matrix”
- Supervised Learning Under Distributed Features (2018, background): “Fortunately, problems involving delays in gradient calculations are well-studied in the distributed machine learning and signal processing literature [57]–[59].”
- A Decentralized Proximal-Gradient Method With Network Independent Step-Sizes and Separated Convergence Rates (2017, methodology): “EXTRA is equivalent to the Condat-Vu primal-dual algorithm [47], [55], and it can be further explained as a forward-backward”
- Communication-Censored ADMM for Decentralized Consensus Optimization (2019, background): “This brief survey is also far from complete; for example, it does not include asynchronous algorithms that are important to heterogeneous networks [30].”
- Optimization over time-varying directed graphs with row and column-stochastic matrices (2018, methodology): “Furthermore, asynchronous multi-agent optimization is considered in [46], where the authors adapt the curvature estimation technique of the Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno quasi-Newton optimization method [47]–[49] for use in asynchronous distributed settings over undirected graphs [50].”
- Push–Pull Gradient Methods for Distributed Optimization in Networks (2018, background): “Paper [30] extends the work in [2] to handle asynchrony and delays.”
- Decentralized Consensus Optimization With Asynchrony and Delays (2016, background): “This paper was presented at the 2016 Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers, Pacific Grove, CA, USA, November 6–9, 2016 [1].”
- Asynchronous Decentralized Online Learning (2021, methodology): “Similar to the simulation method in [25], the computation time of learner i follows the exponential distribution Exp(μi) with mean value μi = |μ̄|+ 2, where μ̄ is sampled from the standard normal distribution Normal(0, 1).”