Visual illusion induced by sound.

By Ladan Shams, Yukiyasu Kamitani, Shinsuke Shimojo. Brain research. Cognitive brain research, 2002

640 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c06d54af166237a7fe876287bda2c62bacff9612

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

A Neural Network Model of Ventriloquism Effect and Aftereffect (2012, positive): “It is well known that the auditory system has far better temporal acuity than vision, resulting in capture of the visual stimulus by the auditory one in the temporal realm [57].”
Sound-induced flash illusion as an optimal percept (2005, background): “The sound-induced flash illusion [10,11] is a psychophysical paradigm in which both integration and segregation of auditory–visual signals occur depending on the stimulus condition.”
Neural Correlates of Multisensory Perceptual Learning (2012, background): “…order of several hundred milliseconds) the paired presentation of auditory and visual events are likely to result in neurophysiological, behavioral, and perceptual changes thought to reflect the multisensory binding process (Meredith et al., 1987; Shams et al., 2002; Colonius and Diederich, 2004).”
Audiovisual Synchrony Improves Motion Discrimination via Enhanced Connectivity between Early Visual and Auditory Areas (2010, background): “Temporal proximity between auditory and visual stimuli is an essential cue, informing the brain whether they emanate from a common source and should hence be integrated in perception (Munhall et al., 1996; Sekuler et al., 1997; Shams et al., 2002).”
Mappings between linguistic sound and motion (2013, background): “…and research in motion perception has shown that auditory information in particular is vital to the perception of motion (e.g., Colonius and Arndt, 2001; Shams, Kamitani, and Shimojo, 2002; Soto-Faraco, Lyons, Gazzaniga, Spence, and Kingstone, 2002; Poirier et al., 2005; Poirier et al., 2006).”
The contents of long-term memory and the emergence of knowledge (2009, background): “For example, Shams, Kamitani, and Shimojo ( 2002 ) have shown that when a short flash of light (17 ms) is presented together with acoustic beeps (17 ms), the participants have the impression of perceiving multiple flashes as long as the beeps are presented during a period of 100 ms before or after t”
Visual-haptic cue weighting is independent of modality-specific attention. (2008, background): “Along this line, a number of studies observed that even when observers were explicitly instructed to ignore one sensory modality, the bimodal percept was strongly influenced by the task-irrelevant sensory signal (e.g., Bresciani et al., 2005, 2006; De Gelder & Vroomen, 2000; Helbig & Ernst, 2007a; M”
Perception of intersensory synchrony: A tutorial review (2010, neutral): “…window of integration, inasmuch as intervals ranged from 250 msec before visual coincidence to 150 msec after coincidence (see also Bertelson & Aschersleben, 1998, for the effect of temporal asynchrony on spatial ventriloquism, or Shams, Kamitani, & Shimojo, 2002, for the illusory-flash effect).”
Cognitive Penetrability of Perception in the Age of Prediction: Predictive Systems are Penetrable Systems (2015, background): “Returning to vision: it is known that appropriately timed sounds can qualitatively change what one sees (e.g., Shams et al. 2002; Watanabe and Shimojo 2001).”
Causality and cross-modal integration. (2009, background): “presented tones (Shams et al., 2002), (b) the perceived rate of visual”
Multisensory convergence in calcarine visual areas in macaque monkey. (2003, background): “Shams et al. (2002) recently reported that a single visual flash accompanied by two auditory beeps is perceived as two flashes, and that this sound-induced illusory effect is stronger in the lower visual field(corresponding to the upper bank of the CF) and in the peripheral field representation.”