What High-Achieving Low-Income Students Know About College
By C. Hoxby, Sarah Turner. 2015
248 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c06b33f292b3fdadba8288e59b8d03a35d2a505c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Sean F. Reardon
- Kallie Clark
- Benjamin M. Marx
- Rachel B. Baker
- Elaine Allensworth
- Daniel Klasik
- Lesley J. Turner
- Ann Owens
Citations in the corpus
- Race and Stratification in College Enrollment Over Time (2018, background): “However, many students are not aware that sticker price can differ significantly from net price, or they have difficulty finding net price information (Hoxby & Turner, 2015), so the positive correlation between selectivity and price generally holds.”
- Student Loan Nudges: Experimental Evidence on Borrowing and Educational Attainment (2017, background): “…reductions in already-small costs of college applications (Pallais 2015), providing information to high-achieving, low-income students (Hoxby and Turner 2015), sending text messages about obtaining financial aid and advancing in college (Castleman and Page 2015, 2016), and giving unemployed…”
- High School GPAs and ACT Scores as Predictors of College Completion: Examining Assumptions About Consistency Across High Schools (2020, background): “High schools might develop structures to prepare students with more “college knowledge” to navigate the postsecondary realm (Conley, 2008; Hoxby & Turner, 2015), provide a more diverse environment that teaches students to adjust to new situations and people (Tam & Bassett, 2004), or provide many…”
- Nudging in education (2018, unknown): “Similar adverse effects were found in a US intervention introducing a performance-based leader board which announced the top three performers in the classroom, school and among all users of the computer-based course tool (Bursztyn & Jensen, 2015). This led to a 24% decrease in performance, primarily”