Foundations of mixed methods research

By C. Teddlie, A. Tashakkori. 2013

996 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c0358273272236d219348ef361fd9c6d9f520f81

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Bridging the Qualitative-Quantitative Divide: Guidelines for Conducting Mixed Methods Research in Information Systems (2013, background): “Other researchers proposed different typologies of mixed methods research with respect to the temporal sequence of data collection and analyses (for a review of these typologies, see Morse 2003; Teddlie and Tashakkori 2009).”
Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution (2014, background): “In the last decades, the movement of mixed methods research has evolved as a new alternative, as a “third way” in social and behavioral science (Creswell & Plano Clark, 2010; Teddlie & Tashakkori, 2009).”
Key Stakeholders' Perceptions of Effective School Leadership (2012, background): “The chosen case was seen as being rich in information in regards to the questions the researchers wanted to answer, and offering a major focus for the investigation (Tashakorri and Teddlie, 2009: 173–174).”
Conceptualizing Longitudinal Mixed Methods Designs (2015, methodology): “…set to the collection of data from another; juxtaposing quantitative and qualitative results for comparison; transforming one form of data to facilitate the other form of analysis; or forming interpretations from the two sets of results (Creswell & Plano Clark, 2011; Teddlie & Tashakkori, 2009).”
Methodological Implications of Critical Realism for Mixed-Methods Research (2013, methodology): “2002), we follow the classification proposed in Venkatesh et al. (2013) and Teddlie and Tashakkori (2003, 2009).”