Measuring perceived and received social support.
By T. Wills, Ori Shinar. 2000
705 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c0250681bb1442fbc917b27c2b67b87b902bb61b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Richard M. Ryan
- Valery Chirkov
- J. La Guardia
- Maarten Vansteenkiste
- Lisa M. Davidson
- Bart Soenens
- Margaret L. Kern
- Youngmee Kim
Citations in the corpus
- On the interpersonal regulation of emotions: Emotional reliance across gender, relationships, and cultures (2005, background): “These results fit with the theoretical benefits outlined by Reis and Franks (1994) and Wills and Shinar (2000), among others.”
- How Does Perceived Support Lead to Better Performance? An Examination of Potential Mechanisms (2009, methodology): “Perception of support availability was assessed using a 20-item self-report questionnaire constructed specifically for this study, to ensure the measure was relevant to the population under study (House & Kahn, 1985; Wills & Shinar, 2000).”
- Measuring perceived community support: Factorial structure, longitudinal invariance, and predictive validity of the PCSQ (perceived community support questionnaire) (2007, background): “…documenting the positive association between social support from close and intimate relationships and health and psychological well-being, and a sizeable number of psychometrically sound instruments are available to researchers (see, e.g., Vaux, 1992; Wills & Shinar, 2000, for revisions).”
- Why individuals in larger teams perform worse (2012, background): “…to find a significant relationship between the amount of help received and individual level performance (George & Zhou, 2001, 2007; Mueller & Kamdar, 2011) as well as help receipt and perceived support (Helgeson, 1993; Lakey & Heller, 1988; Sarason, Sarason, & Pierce, 1990; Wills & Shinar, 2000).”
- Peer support within a health care context: a concept analysis. (2003, methodology): “the provision of practical help or tangible aid) (Wills and Shinar, 2000) does occur rarely as a supportive function in peer relationships but due to its infrequency it is not a defining attribute.”
- Understanding the Links Between Social Support and Physical Health: A Life-Span Perspective With Emphasis on the Separability of Perceived and Received Support (2009, background): “…as perceived support has been more consistently related to beneficial health outcomes than has received support (Barrera, 2000; Uchino, 2004; Wills & Shinar, 2000).1 A life-span perspective can inform theoretical models as to why differences exist between perceived and received support…”
- Matching social support with stressors: Effects on factors underlying performance in tennis. (2004, background): “Generally, it is perceived availability of social support that has been most consistently linked with the buffering hypothesis (Cohen, 1988; Cohen, Gottlieb, & Underwood, 2000; Cohen & Hoberman, 1983; Cohen & Wills, 1985; Wills & Shinar, 2000).”
- Social Support as a Moderator Between Victimization and Internalizing–Externalizing Distress From Bullying (2007, background): “Several studies have demonstrated a stress-buffering effect when measuring social support with perceived measures, but not with received measures (DunkelSchetter & Bennet, 1990, and Wethington & Kessler, 1986, as cited in Wills & Shinar, 2000).”
- Influence of Social Identity on Self-Efficacy Beliefs Through Perceived Social Support: A Social Identity Theory Perspective (2016, background): “Social support has been found to be associated with lower health symptomatology (Wills & Shinar, 2000), lower mortality (Kessler & McLeod, 1985), and better mental and physical health (House, Landis, & Umberson, 1988).”
- Compassionate love for close others and humanity (2005, methodology): “Our measure assessed multiple dimensions of support (Argyle, 1992; Wills & Shinar, 2000) by asking participants the degree to which they believed they have offered ‘others’ each of the following types of social support: emotional support, instrumental support, information support, at UNIV…”