Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Review of Successes, Challenges, and Opportunities
By D. Rodbard. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 2016
696 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) provides information unattainable by intermittent capillary blood glucose, including instantaneous real-time display of glucose level and rate of change of glucose, alerts and alarms for actual or impending hypo- and hyperglycemia, “24/7” coverage, and the ability to characterize glycemic variability. Progressively more accurate and precise, reasonably unobtrusive, small, comfortable, user-friendly devices connect to the Internet to share information and are sine qua non for a closed-loop artificial pancreas. CGM can inform, educate, motivate, and alert people with diabetes. CGM is medically indicated for patients with frequent, severe, or nocturnal hypoglycemia, especially in the presence of hypoglycemia unawareness. Surprisingly, despite tremendous advances, utilization of CGM has remained fairly limited to date. Barriers to use have included the following: (1) lack of Food and Drug Administration approval, to date, for insulin dosing (“nonadjuvant use”) in the United States and for use in hospital and intensive care unit settings; (2) cost and variable reimbursement; (3) need for recalibrations; (4) periodic replacement of sensors; (5) day-to-day variability in glycemic patterns, which can limit the predictability of findings based on retrospective, masked “professional” use; (6) time, implicit costs, and inconvenience for uploading of data for retrospective analysis; (7) lack of fair and reasonable reimbursement for physician time; (8) inexperience and lack of training of physicians and other healthcare professionals regarding interpretation of CGM results; (9) lack of standardization of software methods for analysis of CGM data; and (10) need for professional medical organizations to develop and disseminate additional clinical practice guidelines regarding the role of CGM. Ongoing advances in technology and clinical research have addressed several of these barriers. Use of CGM in conjunction with an insulin pump with automated suspension of insulin infusion in response to actual observed or predicted hypoglycemia, as well as progressive refinement of closed-loop systems, is expected to dramatically enhance the clinical utility and utilization of CGM.
Subfields: Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Surgery
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bff01054cdaefbccb3df686cccc88b7ca0960a3b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
- Boris P. Kovatchev
- Eric Renard
- Claudio Cobelli
- J. Hans DeVries
- I. Hirsch
- D. Rodbard
- Chao Yu
- Jiming Liu
In Surgery
- Boris P. Kovatchev
- Eric Renard
- Claudio Cobelli
- J. Hans DeVries
- I. Hirsch
- Chao Yu
- Jiming Liu
- Shamim Nemati
Citations in the corpus
- Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range (2019, positive): “obstacles, clinician inexperience in data interpretation and lack of standardization software for visualization of CGM data have also played a role (73).”
- Remote patient monitoring: a comprehensive study (2017, background): “A recent study compares continuous glucose monitoring methods and traditional clinic based glucose monitoring by a professional and assess the pros and cons of the two types in terms of usage, accuracy, acceptability (Rodbard 2016).”