Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range

By T. Battelino, T. Danne, R. Bergenstal, S. Amiel, R. Beck, T. Biester, E. Bosi, B. Buckingham, W. Cefalu, Kelly L Close and 32 more. Diabetes Care, 2019

3,368 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Improvements in sensor accuracy, greater convenience and ease of use, and expanding reimbursement have led to growing adoption of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). However, successful utilization of CGM technology in routine clinical practice remains relatively low. This may be due in part to the lack of clear and agreed-upon glycemic targets that both diabetes teams and people with diabetes can work toward. Although unified recommendations for use of key CGM metrics have been established in three separate peer-reviewed articles, formal adoption by diabetes professional organizations and guidance in the practical application of these metrics in clinical practice have been lacking. In February 2019, the Advanced Technologies & Treatments for Diabetes (ATTD) Congress convened an international panel of physicians, researchers, and individuals with diabetes who are expert in CGM technologies to address this issue. This article summarizes the ATTD consensus recommendations for relevant aspects of CGM data utilization and reporting among the various diabetes populations.

Subfields: Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Surgery

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4ea5ef8f00abbd4380a13d9022c3a7e5eabea8ca

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

  1. Eric Renard
  2. J. Hans DeVries
  3. I. Hirsch
  4. M. S. Kirkman
  5. V. Basevi

In Surgery

  1. Eric Renard
  2. J. Hans DeVries
  3. I. Hirsch
  4. M. S. Kirkman

Citations in the corpus