Dyadic military conflict, security alliances, and bilateral FDI flows

By Quan Li, Tatiana Vashchilko. 2010

280 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Development, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bfc38e6bbbba343d96a537db20ddfd3750c44f5a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Development

1. Jing-Lin Duanmu
2. Sonal S. Pandya
3. Jonathan P. Doh

In Strategy and Management

1. C. Jones
2. John Crotty
3. Jing-Lin Duanmu
4. Sonal S. Pandya
5. Nigel Driffield
6. Jonathan P. Doh
7. Mona V. Makhija
8. Mike W. Peng

Citations in the corpus

• Multinationals and corporate social responsibility in host countries: Does distance matter? (2011, unknown): “…2010; Kogut & Singh, 1988; Morosini, Shane, & Singh, 1998; Shenkar, 2001; Tihanyi, Griffith, & Russell, 2005), institutional distance (e.g., Berry, Guillen, & Zhou, 2010; Eden & Miller, 2004; Xu & Shenkar, 2002), and geographic distance (e.g., Egger & Pfaffermayr, 2004; Li & Vashchilko, 2010).”
• Multinational Enterprises and the Sustainable Development Goals: What Do We Know and How to Proceed? (2017, unknown): “Whereas military conflict reduces bilateral investment, security alliances increase it (Li and Vashchilko, 2010).”
• Political Economy of Foreign Direct Investment: Globalized Production in the Twenty-First Century (2016, background): “Interstate conflicts dampen FDI flows, but security alliances boost flows for high-income–low-income dyads (Li & Vashchilko 2010).”
• International business research and risky investments, an analysis of FDI in conflict zones (2013, background): “9 on Li and Vashchilko (2010), who argue that a major factor in explaining why interstate conflict deters FDI, while security pacts encourage FDI flows, is because of the implicit approval or disapproval that firms receive from their home governments.”
• State-owned MNCs and host country expropriation risk: The role of home state soft power and economic gunboat diplomacy (2014, background): “Past research finds that the strength of political ties between a home-host pair has a direct and positive impact on bilateral trade (Morrow, Silverson, & Tabaresem, 1998; Pollins, 1989; Boehmer, Gartzke, & Li, 2001) and FDI flows (Nigh, 1985; Li & Vashchilko, 2010).”
• International business responses to institutional voids (2017, background): “For example, Li and Vashchilko (2010) suggest that cross-national security agreements serve as a form of institutional borrowing that reduces transaction costs for MNEs through lower political risks, resulting in higher bilateral investment flows between high- and low-income countries.”