Food and cash transfers: evidence from Colombia

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Assessing the Long-Term Effects of Conditional Cash Transfers on Human Capital: Evidence from Colombia (2011, background): “The program now covers nearly 2.8 million participating households in 1,093 municipalities, representing almost 65 percent of the target population (Acción Social, 2010b; Attanasio et al., 2009).”
The Effect of Cash, Vouchers, and Food Transfers on Intimate Partner Violence: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment in Northern Ecuador (2016, unknown): “…increase the share of food in total consumption, counter to Engel’s Law, suggesting that households treat transfer income differently ( Angelucci and Attanasio 2013; Attanasio, Battistin, and Mesnard 2012; Gilligan et al. 2014; Schady and Rosero 2008; Attanasio and Lechene 2014; Bobonis 2009 .”
Efficient Responses to Targeted Cash Transfers (2013, unknown): “This fact has been documented in the context of the urban version of the Mexican program by Angelucci and Attanasio ð2009, 2013Þ, in ruralMexico by Attanasio and Lechene ð2010Þ, in the context of a similar program in Colombia by Attanasio, Battistin, and Mesnard ð2012Þ, and in the case of a cash tra”
Welfare consequences of food prices increases: Evidence from rural Mexico (2013, methodology): “Attanasio et al. (2009) and Attanasio and Lechene (2010) have shown that to estimate the demand system in Eq.”