Structural validity of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form: The bifactor model of emotional, social and psychological well-being

By Veljko Jovanovic. 2015

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Health, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bf86c22fe7a87c568b13976df80243289f3e3f69

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. D. Disabato
2. Fallon R. Goodman
3. S. Joseph
4. Iain Coyne
5. Ylenio Longo
6. Scott Kauffman
7. T. Kashdan
8. Paul J Silvia

In Health

1. S. Joseph
2. Iain Coyne
3. Ylenio Longo
4. Scott Kauffman
5. Fallon R. Goodman
6. D. Disabato
7. T. Kashdan

In Social Psychology

1. D. Disabato
2. Fallon R. Goodman
3. T. Kashdan
4. Scott Kauffman
5. S. Joseph
6. Iain Coyne
7. Ylenio Longo
8. M. Steger

Citations in the corpus

• Measuring well-being: A comparison of subjective well-being and PERMA (2018, result): “The findings add to a growing body of work (Disabato et al., 2016; Jovanovic, 2015; Longo et al., 2016) that suggests well-being is best conceptualized as one factor consisting of unique facets (i.”
• The scales of general well-being (SGWB) (2017, methodology): “Additional studies indicated support for a general factor of well-being using a bifactor model (Chen, Jing, Hayes & Lee, 2013; de Bruin & du Plessis, 2015; Jovanović, 2015).”