How pure are your vesicles?
By J. Webber, Aled Clayton. Journal of Extracellular Vesicles, 2013
753 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We propose a straightforward method to estimate the purity of vesicle preparations by comparing the ratio of nano-vesicle counts to protein concentration, using tools such as the increasingly available NanoSight platform and a colorimetric protein assay such as the BCA-assay. Such an approach is simple enough to apply to every vesicle preparation within a given laboratory, assisting researchers as a routine quality control step. Also, the approach may aid in comparing/standardising vesicle purity across diverse studies, and may be of particular importance in evaluating vesicular biomarkers. We herein propose some criteria to aid in the definition of pure vesicles.
Subfields: Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bf75afc95b0ae97047d18d132796ba019b5cdf77
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Molecular Biology
- Hina Kalra
- C. Théry
- G. Drummen
- Suresh Mathivanan
- M. Bracke
- Rienk Nieuwland
- Pieter Mestdagh
- Juan Manuel Falcón-Pérez
Citations in the corpus
- Focus on Extracellular Vesicles: Introducing the Next Small Big Thing (2016, background): “Finally, specific purification protocols after ultracentrifugation not only affect EV purity and yield, but often lead to protein loss in the preparation [163,164].”
- Optimized exosome isolation protocol for cell culture supernatant and human plasma (2015, methodology): “Density gradient purification is a technique repeatedly shown to provide the highest degree of purity (6,12,13).”
- Methods for Separation and Characterization of Extracellular Vesicles: Results of a Worldwide Survey Performed by the ISEV Rigor and Standardization Subcommittee (2020, background): “EV separation: Several years after the 2015 survey [8], ultracentrifugation remains the most common EV separation technique, despite potential drawbacks such as aggregation and incomplete separation [15,16].”
- The impact of disparate isolation methods for extracellular vesicles on downstream RNA profiling (2014, methodology): “2 mm filters to obtain the CCM, and (b) no extra washing step was carried out in regard to recently published observations (11).”
- Techniques used for the isolation and characterization of extracellular vesicles: results of a worldwide survey (2016, positive): “EVs isolated by ultracentrifugation are known to suffer from non-vesicular macromolecule contamination (9).”