Characterizing the phylogenetic structure of communities by an additive partitioning of phylogenetic diversity

By Olivier J. Hardy, Bruno Senterre. 2007

270 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bf7061ef6624efb8cfe0c2ea4e99b8d69504900d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Genetics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Generalized linear mixed models for phylogenetic analyses of community structure (2011, background): “For example, Hardy and Senterre (2007) correlated a phylogenetic measure of differences be-tween tree communities (beta diversity) in Equatorial Guinea with environmental differences between sites and found that greater compositional differences be-tween communities were associated with greater…”
Flower colour and phylogeny along an altitudinal gradient in the Himalayas of Nepal (2014, background): “For example, Hardy & Senterre (2007) found phylogenetic clustering among trees over a 300–1300 m range in Monte Al en National Park in Equatorial Guinea due to the © 2013 The Authors.”
Woody Plant Diversity, Evolution, and Ecology in the Tropics: Perspectives from Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests (2009, methodology): “Community phylogenetics has been used to explain community diversity maintained by ecological filtering, competitive exclusion (e.g., Emerson & Gillespie 2008, Webb et al. 2002, Vamosi et al. 2009), or over ecological gradients (e.g., Graham & Fine 2008, Hardy 2008, Hardy & Senterre 2007).”
Measuring biodiversity to explain community assembly: a unified approach (2011, background): “…research on community assembly has shifted the emphasis away from simple measures of species diversity to trait- and phylogenetic-based determinants of diversity (Webb et al., 2002; Silvertown et al., 2006; Hardy & Senterre, 2007; Cavender-Bares et al., 2009; Pavoine, Baguette & Bonsall, 2010).”
Resolving Darwin’s naturalization conundrum: a quest for evidence (2010, methodology): “First, as shown by studies of community assembly, phylogenetic scale can impact the observed signal of phylogenetic structure and therewith dissimilarity measures in natural communities (Hardy & Senterre, 2007).”
Using functional traits and phylogenetic trees to examine the assembly of tropical tree communities (2012, methodology): “For both indices, significantly positive values are indicative of local phylogenetic clustering (Hardy & Senterre 2007) and can be interpreted as a phylogenetic turnover among sites.”
Phylogenetic beta diversity: linking ecological and evolutionary processes across space in time. (2008, methodology): “Hardy & Senterre (2007) and Chave et al. 2007 extended additive partitioning methods developed using species data to evaluate phylogenetic diversity in terms of both alpha-diversity and beta-diversity components.”
Unifying Species Diversity, Phylogenetic Diversity, Functional Diversity, and Related Similarity and Differentiation Measures Through Hill Numbers (2014, methodology): “Because the pooling concept has been a debated issue in the literature (Hardy & Senterre 2007, Hardy & Jost 2008, Villéger & Mouillot 2008, de Bello et al. 2010) and is essential in diversity analysis, we give a numerical example in Supplemental Appendix 3 to explain the difference between the two…”
Emerging patterns in the comparative analysis of phylogenetic community structure (2009, background): “Hardy & Senterre (2007) derived a set of abundance-based phylogenetic diversity metrics based on Simpson diversity and allowing a local-vs.”
Phylogenetic patterns are not proxies of community assembly mechanisms (they are far better) (2015, unknown): “There are multiple methodological approaches that may help identifying the effect of lineage-pools of habitats (Hardy 2008) and there are others permitting to filter them out (Hardy & Senterre 2007, Baraloto et al. 2012).”
Measuring diversity: the importance of species similarity. (2012, background): “Its importance is explained in Hill (1973) and Jost (2006); and as shown by Jost (2009), replication is essential for reasoning logically about conservation.”
Phylogenetic turnover in tropical tree communities: impact of environmental filtering, biogeography and mesoclimatic niche conservatism (2012, methodology): “This value is comparable to that found along a c. 1000 m elevation gradient of forest tree communities from Central Africa (Hardy & Senterre, 2007) but it is much lower than the PST of c. 0.05 reported when comparing different plant formations occurring on inselbergs (Parmentier & Hardy, 2009).”
Assembly rules of ectoparasite communities across scales: combining patterns of abiotic factors, host composition, geographic space, phylogeny and traits (2015, unknown): “Th ese tests developed by Pavoine et al. (2010) and based on Hardy and Senterre (2007) are designed to evaluate the degree of environmental fi ltering versus limiting similarity.”