Asymptotic separability in sensitivity analysis
By Joseph L. Gastwirth, Abba M. Krieger, Paul R. Rosenbaum. 2000
83 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bf539daac23201ad29a3a956eb39d65f3f64ab18
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Qingyuan Zhao
- Paul R. Rosenbaum
- Dylan S. Small
- J. Hsu
- José R. Zubizarreta
- Peng Ding
- Jelle J. Goeman
- Aldo Solari
In Statistics and Probability
- Qingyuan Zhao
- José R. Zubizarreta
- Paul R. Rosenbaum
- Dylan S. Small
- Peng Ding
- Kevin Guo
- Guido W. Imbens
- Susan Athey
Citations in the corpus
- Attributing Effects to a Cluster-Randomized Get-Out-the-Vote Campaign (2009, unknown): “This separable optimization is simpler than direct minimization of z(a) subject to 0 ≤ a ≤ A and a′1 = a, or “joint optimization” (Gastwirth et al. 2000), and unlike joint optimization it is always computationally feasible.”
- On Sensitivity Value of Pair-Matched Observational Studies (2017, background): “When there are multiple controls for each treated observation, the theoretical analysis becomes more difficult as there is no closed form solution of the bounding variable TΓ, though it is possible to find the asymptotic normal distribution of TΓ (Gastwirth et al., 2000).”
- Design sensitivity in observational studies (2004, background): “As shown in Gastwirth et al. (2000, § 3·1), in matched set i, the largest null expectation of Wk+1 j=1 Z ij q ij under (1) is k Ci = max aµ{1, . . . ,k} qWaj=1 qi(j)+C Wk+1j=a+1 qi(j)a+C(k+1−a) r .”