The role of institutional ownership in the market for auditing services: an empirical investigation

By Gregory D. Kane, Uma Velury. 2004

177 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bf4109dd61dcb7dc20d7b54a5eef6318f634c710

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. T. Fagbemi
2. D. Deis
3. L. Paape
4. Santanu Mitra
5. Mahmud Hossain
6. S. Adeyemi
7. R. Speklé
8. Johannes K. Brustbauer

In Strategy and Management

1. T. Fagbemi
2. D. Deis
3. Santanu Mitra
4. Mahmud Hossain
5. S. Adeyemi
6. R. Speklé

Citations in the corpus

• AUDIT QUALITY, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND FIRM CHARACTERISTICS IN NIGERIA (2010, methodology): “This operationalization follows the approach used in Kane and Velury (2002) where big audit firms are assumed to have quality audit services than other smaller audit firms.”
• The Adoption and Design of Enterprise Risk Management Practices: An Empirical Study (2012, background): “This additional influence of institutional investors arises from two related sources (Kane and Velury, 2004): (1) as institutional owners hold large shares in the firm, they control a substantial part of the voting rights that can be employed directly to influence management, and (2) the control of ”
• The empirical relationship between ownership characteristics and audit fees (2007, background): “ Kane and Velury (2004) argue that mere potential to use voting power, as opposed to actual use, allows institutions to influence management.”