The Hyperbolic Consumption Model: Calibration, Simulation, and Empirical Evaluation
By George-Marios Angeletos, David Laibson, A. Repetto, Jeremy Tobacman, Stephen Weinberg. 2001
961 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bf1d9ea37c551b8df803ff294efaf0e842f17f53
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Anna Lusardi
- Jing Jian Xiao
- Jonathan Zinman
- Olivia S. Mitchell
- Michaela Pagel
- Greg Kaplan
- Giovanni L. Violante
- Arna Olafsson
In Economics and Econometrics
- Michaela Pagel
- Anna Lusardi
- Jing Jian Xiao
- Jonathan Zinman
- Stefano DellaVigna
- B. Kőszegi
- Raj Chetty
- Colin F. Camerer
Citations in the corpus
- Temptation and Taxation (2005, neutral): “Wt(k) = max k′≤f(k) {u(f(k)− k′) + δWt+1(k) + Vt+1(k, k′)} − max k̃′≤f(k) {Vt+1(k, k̃′)}, (3)”
- Tax incidence when individuals are time-inconsistent: the case of cigarette excise taxes (2004, positive): “For example, Angeletos et al. (2001) show that a hyperbolic discounting model fits observed consumption and savings patterns much better than an exponential one; in particular, the pattern of high illiquid wealth holdings (e.g.”
- Contract Design and Self-Control: Theory and Evidence (2004, positive): “For benefits b in the range $20-$100, this implies a calibrated β in the range .7-.95, comparable to the estimates in the literature (Angeletos et al., 2001; Paserman, 2003).”
- The Liquid Hand-to-Mouth: Evidence from Personal Finance Management Software (2018, positive): “Angeletos et al. (2001) and Laibson et al. (2003) show that households with hyperbolic-discounting preferences optimally decide to lock their wealth in the illiquid asset in order to cope with self-control problems.”
- The Effect of Dividends on Consumption (2007, neutral): “9 A closely related, but behavioral, explanation for the high propensity to consume current income is hyperbolic discounting as in Angeletos et al. (2001).”
- Welfare Payments and Crime (2011, neutral): “…needs and for engaging in activities that incapacitate them 2 Phelps and Pollak (1968) develop a simple framework of short-run impatience, and this framework is employed by Laibson (1997), O’Donoghue and Rabin (1999, 2001), and Angeletos et al. (2001) to consider a variety of economic applications.”
- Behavioral Economics and Public Policy: A Pragmatic Perspective (2015, positive): “For example, Angeletos et al. (2001) calibrate Laibson’s β−δ model using consumption data and show that individuals exhibit substantial presentbias when making savings decisions, calling for policies to increase savings rates such as those discussed in Section II.”
- What Would You Do with $500? Spending Responses to Gains, Losses, News, and Loans (2018, positive): “For example, the model of temptation and selfcontrol in Gul and Pesendorfer (2001) and Kovacs and Moran (2017), or the model of quasi-hyperbolic discounting in Angeletos et al. (2001), typically generate higher MPCs to gains of all sizes than models that abstract from these features.”