Strong Reciprocity and the Roots of Human Morality

By Herbert Gintis, Joseph Henrich, Samuel Bowles, Robert Boyd, Ernst Fehr. 2008

191 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/beaa2fd310b46080085848d9e2e773775e3d7a8a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Safety Research

1. Andy Gardner
2. Stuart A. West
3. Daniel Taylor
4. C. Mouden
5. Alex Mesoudi

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Andy Gardner
2. Daniel Taylor
3. C. Mouden
4. Stuart A. West
5. Alex Mesoudi
6. A. Griffin
7. E. Kiers
8. R. F. Denison

Citations in the corpus

• Evolution of the social contract (2014, background): “Secondly, that the theoretical foundations of strong reciprocity are inconsistent, and that in fact, it is no different from ‘weak reciprocity,’ that is the name that this group has given to traditional theories of cooperation [Gintis et al., 2008].”
• Sixteen common misconceptions about the evolution of cooperation in humans (2011, background): “They are mathematically identical (Frank, 1986, 1995b;”