Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness
By H. Beckerman, M. Roebroeck, G. Lankhorst, Jules G. Becher, P. D. Bezemer, A. Verbeek. Quality of Life Research, 2001
866 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Pharmacology, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/be09a66ff616595e2110e80fc86af051894053ec
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Pharmacology
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke. (2005, methodology): “Beckerman et al. (38) suggested the calculation of an “error band” around the mean difference of the 2 measurements, d; the 95% SRD was defined by: 95% SRD d SRD 9 To allow the SRD to be independent of the units of measurement, and thereby used to determine a relative difference after an interventio”
- How to assess the reliability of measurements in rehabilitation. (2005, methodology): “The “smallest real difference” (SRD), introduced by Beckerman et al.14 is one way to evaluate clinically important changes.”
- Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. (2007, neutral): “05, can be interpreted as a ‘‘real’’ change, above measurement error, in one individual (SDCind) [31,32].”