Implicit self-esteem and social anxiety: differential self-favouring effects in high and low anxious individuals

By P. Jong. 2002

105 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bddf457a5b38e97f89bd5dd6d8e54342b755c80d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. D. Barnes-Holmes
2. Yvonne Barnes-Holmes
3. Ian Stewart
4. Klaus Fiedler
5. R. Milne
6. E. Hayden
7. M. Bluemke

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Yvonne Barnes-Holmes
2. D. Barnes-Holmes
3. Ian Stewart
4. Klaus Fiedler
5. R. Milne
6. E. Hayden

Citations in the corpus

• Do You Really Know What You Believe? Developing the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) as a Direct Measure of Implicit Beliefs (2006, methodology): “ de Jong, 2002; de Jong et al., 2001; Gemar et al., 2001; Teachman et al., 2001), and it has become an increasingly popular method for assessing implicit attitudes and dysfunctional beliefs.”
• The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (Irap) As a Response-Time and Event-Related-Potentials Methodology for Testing Natural Verbal Relations: A Preliminary Study (2008, unknown): “This basic IAT effect has now been replicated numerous times (e.g. de Jong, 2002; de Jong et al., 2001; Gemar et al., 2001; Teachman, Gregg, & Woody, 2001), and the methodology has become an increasingly popular measure of group-based implicit attitudes and dysfunctional beliefs.”
• The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP ) and the Malleability of Ageist Attitudes (2009, background): “Critically, a divergence between performance on the IAT and the expression of explicit attitudes has been repeatedly shown (e.g., Greenwald & Banaji, 1995; De Houwer, 2002; de Jong, 2002).”
• Unresolved problems with the “I”, the “A”, and the “T”: A logical and psychometric critique of the Implicit Association Test (IAT) (2006, background): “, de Jong, P. J., Wiers, R. W., & Verkooijen, K. (2005). Implicit and explicit attitudes towards smoking in a smoking and a nonsmoking setting.”
• Testing the Fake-ability of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP): The First Study (2007, unknown): “This basic IAT effect has been replicated numerous times (e.g., de Jong, 2002; de Jong, Pasman, Kindt, & van den Hout, 2001; Gemar, Segal, Segratti, & Kennedy, 2001; Teachman, Gregg, & Woody, 2001), and as such the IAT has become a very popular assessment tool for measuring implicit attitudes and ”