A comparison of wave‐based discontinuous Galerkin, ultra‐weak and least‐square methods for wave problems

By Gwénaël Gabard, Pablo Gamallo, Tomi Huttunen. 2011

46 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Mechanics of Materials

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bd742c6af3c17b497d6f6dcd832b16860fecb9b8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Mechanics

1. Antonio Huerta
2. S. Fernández‐Méndez
3. Giorgio Giorgiani
4. David Modesto
5. John Dolbow
6. Dominik Schillinger
7. Xiaoying Zhuang
8. Charles E. Augarde

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. Antonio Huerta
2. S. Fernández‐Méndez
3. David Modesto
4. Giorgio Giorgiani
5. John Dolbow
6. Dominik Schillinger
7. Charles E. Augarde
8. Xiaoying Zhuang

In Mechanics of Materials

1. Antonio Huerta
2. S. Fernández‐Méndez
3. Giorgio Giorgiani
4. John Dolbow
5. Nicolas Moës
6. Dominik Schillinger
7. Xiaoying Zhuang
8. Charles E. Augarde

Citations in the corpus

• High‐order continuous and discontinuous Galerkin methods for wave problems (2013, background): “Embedding the oscillatory behavior of the solution in the approximating functions is another option to improve accuracy, see for instance [11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17].”
• Hybridizable discontinuous Galerkin p‐adaptivity for wave propagation problems (2013, background): “Embedding the oscillatory behavior of the solution in the approximating functions is another option to improve accuracy, see for instance [6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12].”