Hybridizable discontinuous Galerkin p‐adaptivity for wave propagation problems

By Giorgio Giorgiani, S. Fernández‐Méndez, Antonio Huerta. 2013

63 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A p‐adaptive hybridizable discontinuous Galerkin method for the solution of wave problems is presented in a challenging engineering problem. Moreover, its performance is compared with a high‐order continuous Galerkin. The hybridization technique allows to reduce the coupled degrees of freedom to only those on the mesh element boundaries, whereas the particular choice of the numerical fluxes opens the path to a superconvergent postprocessed solution. This superconvergent postprocessed solution is used to construct a simple and inexpensive error estimator. The error estimator is employed to obtain solutions with the prescribed accuracy in the area (or areas) of interest and also drives a proposed iterative mesh adaptation procedure. The proposed method is applied to a nonhomogeneous scattering problem in an unbounded domain. This is a challenging problem because, on the one hand, for high frequencies, numerical difficulties are an important issue because of the loss of the ellipticity and the oscillatory behavior of the solution. And on the other hand, it is applied to real harbor agitation problems. That is, the mild slope equation in frequency domain (Helmholtz equation with nonconstant coefficients) is solved on real geometries with the corresponding perfectly matched layer to damp the diffracted waves. The performance of the method is studied on two practical examples. The adaptive hybridizable discontinuous Galerkin method exhibits better efficiency compared with a high‐order continuous Galerkin method using static condensation of the interior nodes. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Mechanics of Materials

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/91db6fcf2a9ad70885b2abf389d86ac01a756046

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Mechanics

  1. Antonio Huerta
  2. Ruben Sevilla
  3. Xevi Roca
  4. Aleksandar Angeloski
  5. Jaime Peraire
  6. S. Fernández‐Méndez
  7. Giorgio Giorgiani
  8. Steven L. Brunton

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

  1. Antonio Huerta
  2. Ruben Sevilla
  3. Xevi Roca
  4. Aleksandar Angeloski
  5. Jaime Peraire
  6. Hung T. Huynh
  7. John Dolbow

In Mechanics of Materials

  1. Ruben Sevilla
  2. Jaime Peraire
  3. Antonio Huerta
  4. John Dolbow
  5. S. Fernández‐Méndez
  6. Nicolas Moës

Citations in the corpus