Understanding the limits of limiting instructions: Social psychological explanations for the failures of instructions to disregard pretrial publicity and other inadmissible evidence.

By Joel D. Lieberman, Jamie Arndt. 2000

103 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Law, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bd51c89e807dea128b56ff6b8bf5742fc5820d57

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. P. Sol Hart
2. Sahara Byrne

In Sociology and Political Science

1. P. Sol Hart
2. Sahara Byrne

Citations in the corpus

• The Boomerang Effect A Synthesis of Findings and a Preliminary Theoretical Framework (2009, background): “Across studies, evidence suggests a strong relationship between such admonitions and the tendency for jury members to give even more weight to the evidence than they would have if no such instruction were given (for a review, see Lieberman & Arndt, 2000).”