Similarity and local co-existence of species in regional biotas

By M. Leibold. Evolutionary Ecology, 2004

168 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bd3ac434687a03f683b7a86abbe19e7b5a7484d5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Fertilization decreases species diversity but increases functional diversity: A three-year experiment in a Tibetan alpine meadow (2014, background): “On the one hand, FD will decrease because of competitive exclusion and species loss (Leibold, 1997; Grime, 2006; Mayfield and Levine, 2010).”
Disturbance heterogeneity determines freshwater metacommunity structure (2004, background): “Species-sorting models (Leibold 1998) assume that the partitioning of species among variable environments operates according to individual adaptations and that interspecific fitness varies among patches.”
Coexistence of the niche and neutral perspectives in community ecology. (2006, background): “For example, Leibold (1998) examined how interactions mediated via competition for shared resources (shown in Fig.”
Evidence for limiting similarity in a sand dune community (2004, background): “…species being less similar to one another than expected when random species are selected from a broader regional pool, has been in the literature from the original formulation of ‘limiting similarity’ of MacArthur & Levins (1967) to the ‘community-wide character displacement’ of Leibold (1998).”
Linking modern coexistence theory and contemporary niche theory (2017, result): “Note this runs counter to Fig 2.8 of Chase and Leibold (2003, see also discussion on p. 34), but is consistent with Leibold (1998).”
The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology (2004, background): “The second approach builds on theories of community change over environmental gradients (see Whittaker 1962) and considers the effects of local abiotic features on population vital rates and species interactions (Tilman 1982; Leibold 1998; Chase & Leibold 2003).”
Community Patterns in Source‐Sink Metacommunities (2003, background): “These considerations reflect the growing interest among ecologists in studying communities as organized into networks linked by dispersal, called metacommunities (Wilson 1992; Holt 1993; Leibold 1998; Hanski 1999; Hubbell 2001; Mouquet and Loreau 2002).”
Variability in interaction strength and implications for biodiversity (2002, background): “Leibold (1998) suggested that co-existing species are more similar than expected by chance.”
The relationship between species richness and taxonomic distinctness in freshwater organisms (2005, background): “Such an increase may also be related to habitat heterogeneity, with ecologically largely similar, congeneric species being either adapted to slightly different niches or able to avoid direct competition in heterogeneous conditions (see also discussion by Leibold 1998; Chase and Leibold 2003).”
Phylogenies and Community Ecology (2002, methodology): “METHODOLOGICAL ADVANCES Community Phylogenies Phylogenetic methods are in a sustained phase of rapid development, with new maximum-likelihood (Lewis 2001) and Bayesian (Huelsenbeck et al. 2001) approaches being explored.”
The geographic scaling of biotic interactions (2013, background): “In practice, several biotic and abiotic factors can simultaneously affect the distributions of species (Soberón 2010, Peterson et al. 2011) and, therefore, co-occurrence (Cohen 1971, Leibold 1997, Amarasekare et al. 2004, Ovaskainen et al. 2010, Araújo et al. 2011).”