Fertilization decreases species diversity but increases functional diversity: A three-year experiment in a Tibetan alpine meadow

By K. Niu, Philippe Choler, Francesco de Bello, Nicholas Mirotchnick, G. Du, Shucun Sun. 2014

89 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract The link between biodiversity and grassland productivity remains a central puzzle for both theoretical and applied ecologists. Little is known about the response of functional diversity (FD, i.e. the extent of trait differences between organisms in a given community) to increased grassland productivity following fertilization. Species diversity is often used as a surrogate for FD but evidence shows that FD is often independent from species diversity. We conducted a three-year (2004–2006) experiment in a Tibetan alpine grassland to examine the effect of fertilization on FD and SD, and its relationship with productivity. We measured specific leaf area, plant height and seed size for 32 species in control, low- and high-fertilization treatments over three years, and quantified three components of FD: functional richness (FRic), functional evenness (FEve) and functional divergence using Rao's index (FDrao). While SD decreased rapidly, as expected, both FRic and FDrao increased significantly with fertilization. Neither species evenness nor FEve was affected by fertilization. Aboveground biomass was not significantly correlated with SD, but it was significantly positively correlated with both FRic and FDrao, with the strongest correlations found in 2006 for FRic and in 2005 for FDrao. The results showed that FD and SD have opposite responses to short-term fertilization. The increased FD suggests enhanced niche differentiation between species remaining after fertilization, which caused species loss. This study highlights the importance of examining FD in assessing fertilization-induced biodiversity loss and its impacts on ecosystem functioning in grasslands.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8ef500cc4f8b09b00a31bf3ad3abb4d8f4589d4d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

  1. P. Török
  2. Jürgen Dengler
  3. S. Kidwell
  4. A. Tomašovỳch

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

  1. P. Török
  2. Jürgen Dengler

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

  1. P. Török
  2. Camilla Wellstein
  3. Jürgen Dengler
  4. M. Janišová
  5. S. Kidwell
  6. A. Tomašovỳch

Citations in the corpus