Disgust Sensitivity, Political Conservatism, and Voting
By Yoel Inbar, David A Pizarro, Ravi Iyer, Jonathan Haidt. 2012
342 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bd37379ee6e5059212c94e9b88aa2f707c54a3c0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Jay J. Van Bavel
- W. Brady
- Dane G. Wendell
- Laith Al-Shawaf
- J. Wills
- David M. Buss
- John T. Jost
- Paulo Sousa
In Sociology and Political Science
- Jay J. Van Bavel
- W. Brady
- Jared Piazza
- John T. Jost
- Joshua A. Tucker
- Paulo Sousa
- Dane G. Wendell
- Laith Al-Shawaf
Citations in the corpus
- How Disgust Influences Health Purity Attitudes (2016, background): “socially conservative attitudes (e.g., Hibbing et al. 2014; Inbar et al. 2011; Inbar et al. 2009; Smith et al. 2011a).”
- Why are conservatives less concerned about the coronavirus (COVID-19) than liberals? Comparing political, experiential, and partisan messaging explanations (2020, background): “…sensitivity – one of the psychological mechanisms by which disease threat operates – is associated with more conservative policy positions and voting tendencies (Brenner & Inbar, 2015; Helzer & Pizarro, 2011; Inbar et al., 2012; Liuzza et al., 2018; Oosterhoff et al., 2018; Shook et al., 2017).”
- Sex Differences in Disgust: Why Are Women More Easily Disgusted Than Men? (2018, positive): “Disgust affects ingroup–outgroup psychology (Hodson & Costello, 2007); stereotyping and prejudice (Dasgupta, DeSteno, Williams, & Hunsinger, 2009); conservatism, liberalism, and political attitudes (Inbar, Pizarro, Iyer, & Haidt, 2012); and moral judgments (Inbar et al., 2012).”
- Religiosity, Political Orientation, and Consequentialist Moral Thinking (2014, methodology): “By contrast, deontologists (or non-consequentialists) argue that the right or wrongness of an act is inherent in its consistency with, or deviation from, a universal moral rule, or as a function of the act itself, irrespective of the act’s overall consequences (Alexander & Moore, 2008; Kant, 1797/19”
- Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks (2017, background): “Importantly, moral emotions may also be tied specifically to behavior that is relevant to morality and politics, including judgments of responsibility and voting (13, 14).”