Religiosity, Political Orientation, and Consequentialist Moral Thinking

By Jared Piazza, Paulo Sousa. 2014

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bbc7e858224a42b2f7ddbe0d34c9066449401d1b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Azim Shariff
2. Steven J. Heine
3. Robbie M. Sutton
4. Lisa Feldman Barrett
5. Karen M. Douglas

In Social Psychology

1. Azim Shariff
2. Frenk van Harreveld
3. Steven J. Heine
4. Robbie M. Sutton
5. T. Takata
6. Ara Norenzayan
7. Lisa Feldman Barrett
8. Joseph Henrich

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Azim Shariff
2. Frenk van Harreveld
3. Steven J. Heine
4. Robbie M. Sutton
5. Ara Norenzayan
6. Joseph Henrich
7. T. Takata
8. Karen M. Douglas

Citations in the corpus

• Reflective liberals and intuitive conservatives: A look at the Cognitive Reflection Test and ideology (2015, unknown): “Piazza and Sousa (2014) report no significant relationship between political conservatism and intuition as measured via the CRT, but again, this relationship was not the main focus of the study and not fully explored.”
• Attitudes Towards Science (2018, background): “…than liberals (Layman, 2001; Malka, Lelkes, Srivastava, Cohen, & Miller, 2012), and conservatives and religious believers alike emphasize traditional moral values, for example, those values that pertain to purity and naturalness (e.g., Graham, Haidt, & Nosek, 2009; see also Piazza & Sousa, 2014).”
• Does religion increase moral behavior (2015, background): “For example, Piazza and Sousa [6 ] have shown that when confronted with questions about whether violating a moral rule (e.”